...
首页> 外文期刊>Depression and anxiety >Comparison of object and animal hoarding
【24h】

Comparison of object and animal hoarding

机译:物体和动物ho积的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Recent research has highlighted the prevalence and harmful consequences of hoarding,1 and investigators have proposed inclusion of hoarding disorder in DSM-5.2 An unanswered question about the proposed disorder is whether people who hoard animals would meet diagnostic criteria for it. This article discusses the similarities and differences between object and animal hoarding. People who hoard animals appear to meet the basic diagnostic criteria for hoarding disorder. Their homes are cluttered, disorganized, and dysfunctional. They have great difficulty relinquishing animals to people who can more adequately care for them, and they form intense attachments (urges to save) that result in significant impairment. However, they differ from people who hoard objects in several ways. These differences are significant enough to warrant comment in the text description accompanying the diagnostic criteria and consideration as a subtype of hoarding disorder. More research is necessary to determine the exact relationship between object and animal hoarding.
机译:最近的研究强调了ho积的流行和有害后果1,研究人员提议将DS积障碍纳入DSM-5.2。关于所提议的障碍的一个未解决的问题是ho积动物的人是否符合其诊断标准。本文讨论了对象和动物ho积之间的异同。 ho积动物的人似乎符合ho积障碍的基本诊断标准。他们的房屋杂乱无章,功能失调。他们很难将动物交还给可以更充分照顾他们的人,并且它们形成强烈的依恋关系(强烈要求保存),导致严重的伤害。但是,它们与以多种方式ho积物体的人不同。这些差异非常重要,足以保证在文字说明中附上诊断标准并考虑为comment积病的一种亚型。为了确定物体与动物ho积之间的确切关系,还需要进行更多的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号