首页> 外文期刊>Vaccine >Comparative evaluation of three different intramuscular delivery methods for DNA immunization in a nonhuman primate animal model
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of three different intramuscular delivery methods for DNA immunization in a nonhuman primate animal model

机译:非人类灵长类动物模型中三种不同肌肉内递送方法的DNA免疫的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although plasmid DNA vaccines induce potent cell-mediated immune responses and prime for antibody responses in experimental laboratory animals, their immunogenicity in humans has been less remarkable. A number of strategies have been proposed to improve the immunogenicity of these vaccines, including using novel means of vaccine delivery. In the present study, the immunogenicity of three different methods of intramuscular plasmid DNA administration was compared in cynomolgus monkeys: needle and syringe, Biojector 2000, and Mini-Ject. The elicited cellular and humoral immune responses were comparable in monkeys immunized using these different delivery techniques, suggesting that the needle-free approaches to vaccine administration do not significantly improve the immunogenicity of the plasmid DNA vaccine used in the study.
机译:尽管质粒DNA疫苗在实验性实验动物中诱导有效的细胞介导的免疫反应并引发抗体反应,但它们在人体中的免疫原性却不太明显。已经提出了许多策略来改善这些疫苗的免疫原性,包括使用新型的疫苗递送手段。在本研究中,在食蟹猴中比较了三种肌肉内质粒DNA施用方法的免疫原性:针头和注射器,Biojector 2000和Mini-Ject。在使用这些不同的递送技术免疫的猴子中,引起的细胞和体液免疫反应是可比的,这表明无针疫苗接种方法并未显着改善研究中使用的质粒DNA疫苗的免疫原性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号