...
首页> 外文期刊>Vaccine >Why is evidence-based medicine so harsh on vaccines? An exploration of the method and its natural biases
【24h】

Why is evidence-based medicine so harsh on vaccines? An exploration of the method and its natural biases

机译:为什么循证医学对疫苗如此苛刻?该方法及其自然偏差的探讨

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Vaccines have been hailed as one of the greatest success stories of public health in the 20th century. The 20th century also produced a call for evidence-based medicine (EBM) with applications inclusive of preventive health. Since then, several major EBM analyses have called into question vaccine practices well-accepted by physicians, public health officials, and even the lay public. For example, while counter to existing studies and policies, EBM analyses have concluded that data are lacking to support influenza vaccination of healthcare workers to prevent flu complications among the elderly. In this review, we examine the criticisms and consider the shortcomings in the field of vaccinology as well as in the methodology of evidence-based medicine.
机译:疫苗被誉为20世纪公共卫生领域最伟大的成功案例之一。 20世纪还呼吁采用循证医学(EBM),并将其应用于预防性健康。从那时起,几项主要的循证医学分析开始对疫苗的做法提出质疑,这些做法被医生,公共卫生官员,甚至是普通民众所接受。例如,尽管与现有的研究和政策相反,但EBM分析得出的结论是,缺乏支持医护人员进行流感疫苗预防老年人流感并发症的数据。在这篇综述中,我们审查了批评意见,并考虑了疫苗学领域以及循证医学方法学方面的缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号