首页> 外文期刊>Zootaxa >Phylogenies without Synapomorphies-A Crisis in Fish Systematics: Time to Show Some Character
【24h】

Phylogenies without Synapomorphies-A Crisis in Fish Systematics: Time to Show Some Character

机译:没有系统亚型的系统发育-鱼类系统学的危机:显示某些特征的时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We contend that the move away from providing character evidence with phylogenies has diminished fish systematics and systematics in general, and amounts to a crisis. Present practices focus on solutions to matrices rather than on character homology, and rely on algorithms and statistics rather than biology to determine relationships. Optimization procedures in tree-building programs are phenetic and no longer employ homology, the original foundation of cladistics. Evidence for phylogenies is presented in a manner that obscures character conflict and makes meaningful debate difficult. The role of morphological characters has largely been reduced to their optimization and reinterpretation on the revealed "truth" of molecule-based topologies. All of this has resulted in a schism between molecular and morphological phylogeneticists. We examine several examples, focusing on Percomorpha and Gobioidei, to illustrate the shortcomings of recent approaches. We feel that phylogenetics can only move forward by recognizing that molecules are small-scale morphology; molecular data are not substantively different from larger-scale morphological data and should be treated in much the same manner. Careful investigation of homology and transparent presentation of evidence will keep our work and our science relevant. We suggest four measures that need reintroduction to phylogenetic practice in order to bring systematics back to its fundamental principles: (1) examine data quality, character distribution, and evidence; plot characters to identify and examine character conflict, and weigh evidence for homology, (2) explore the nature of character information-data become characters only after they are understood, (3) question assumptions of methods, common practice is not necessarily indicative of the ideal analysis, (4) in particular, question and investigate optimization as a method and what its impact is on character homology and the meaning of synapomorphies; use biology, not algorithms to make homology decisions.
机译:我们认为,放弃提供系统发育特征证据的做法总体上减少了鱼类的系统性和系统性,并构成了危机。当前的实践侧重于矩阵的解决方案,而不是字符同源性,并且依靠算法和统计信息而不是生物学来确定关系。树木建造程序中的优化程序具有吸引力,不再使用同源性,而同源性是分类学的原始基础。系统发育的证据掩盖了角色冲突,使有意义的辩论变得困难。形态特征的作用在很大程度上已简化为它们的优化和对基于分子拓扑的“真相”的重新解释。所有这些都导致了分子和形态学系统发育学家之间的分裂。我们研究了几个以Percomorpha和Gobioidei为重点的示例,以说明最近方法的不足。我们认为,系统发育学只能通过认识到分子是小规模的形态才能向前发展。分子数据与大规模形态数据没有实质性区别,应以相同的方式处理。仔细研究同源性和透明地提供证据将使我们的工作和科学保持相关性。为了使系统学回归其基本原理,我们提出了四种需要重新引入系统发育实践的措施:(1)检查数据质量,字符分布和证据;绘制字符以识别和检查字符冲突,并权衡同源性证据;(2)探索字符信息数据的性质,只有在理解字符后,数据才成为字符;(3)方法的问题假设,通常不一定表示理想分析,(4)特别是,质疑和研究优化作为一种​​方法,以及它对字符同源性和同形意义的影响;使用生物学而不是算法来做出同源性决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号