首页> 外文期刊>Zootaxa >On the taxonomic validity of Pristimantis tepuiensis (Schluter & Rodder, 2007) and P. stegolepis (Schluter & Rodder, 2007), with remarks on the type series of P. guaiquinimensis (Schluter & Rodder, 2007)
【24h】

On the taxonomic validity of Pristimantis tepuiensis (Schluter & Rodder, 2007) and P. stegolepis (Schluter & Rodder, 2007), with remarks on the type series of P. guaiquinimensis (Schluter & Rodder, 2007)

机译:关于Pristimantis tepuiensis(Schluter&Rodder,2007)和Stegolepis(Schluter&Rodder,2007)的分类学有效性,并评论了guaiquinimensis(Schluter&Rodder,2007)的类型系列。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The type series of Pristimantis guaiquinimensis (Schluter & Rodder, 2007), P. tepuiensis (Schluter & Rodder, 2007) and P. stegolepis (Schluter & Rodder, 2007) have been thoroughly examined. We highlight a number of discrepancies in the original descriptions that do not support the recognition of P. stegolepis and P. tepuiensis as valid species. We demonstrate that P. stegolepis should be considered a junior synonym of P. vilarsi (Melin, 1941), and that P. tepuiensis should be considered a junior synonym of P. guaiquinimensis. We also point out that the sex of the holotype and paratype of P. guaiquinimensis have been wrongly determined.
机译:已经对番石榴Pristimantis guaiquinimensis(Schluter&Rodder,2007),tepuiensis(Schluter&Rodder,2007)和Stegolepis(Schluter&Rodder,2007)的类型系列进行了彻底的研究。我们在原始描述中突出了许多差异,这些差异不支持将隐球菌和破伤风菌识别为有效物种。我们证明,体育隐球菌应被视为P. vilarsi的初级同义词(Melin,1941年),并且应将tepuiensis视为P. guaiquinimensis的初级同义词。我们还指出,番石榴假单胞菌的全型和副型的性别被错误地确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号