...
首页> 外文期刊>CIRP Annals >Comparative impact assessment for flax fibre versus conventional glass fibre reinforced composites: Are bio-based reinforcement materials the way to go?
【24h】

Comparative impact assessment for flax fibre versus conventional glass fibre reinforced composites: Are bio-based reinforcement materials the way to go?

机译:亚麻纤维与传统玻璃纤维增​​强复合材料的比较影响评估:生物基增强材料走的路要走吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In many applications the use of composite materials can offer significant weight reduction opportunities, which can have a positive influence on the life cycle impact of a component or system primarily through energy saving effects in the use phase. The impact associated with the production and end-of-life (EOL) phases, however, forms a possible counter indication for systematic replacement of conventional structures by composite solutions. Bio-composites are considered a promising strategy to limit production and EOL impact. In this paper a comparative LCA study is presented for flax fibre reinforced composites based on PP on the one hand, and functionally equivalent glass fibre reinforced PP composites on the other. The analysis results and conclusions derived from a comparative attributional LCA study are summarised in this paper.
机译:在许多应用中,复合材料的使用可以显着减轻重量,这可能主要通过使用阶段的节能效果而对组件或系统的生命周期产生积极影响。但是,与生产和寿命终止(EOL)阶段相关的影响为复合解决方案系统替代常规结构提供了可能的反指示。生物复合材料被认为是限制生产和EOL影响的有前途的策略。在本文中,一方面针对基于PP的亚麻纤维增强复合材料,另一方面针对功能等效的玻璃纤维增​​强PP复合材料,进行了比较性LCA研究。本文总结了来自比较性LCA研究的分析结果和结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号