首页> 外文期刊>Human Reproduction >Scratching beneath 'the Scratching Case': Systematic reviews and metaanalyses, the back door for evidencebased medicine
【24h】

Scratching beneath 'the Scratching Case': Systematic reviews and metaanalyses, the back door for evidencebased medicine

机译:在“抓挠病例”下抓挠:系统评价和元分析,循证医学的后门

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Endometrial scratching or injury was first suggested a decade ago as a simple intervention to improve endometrial receptivity in patients undergoing ART. More than a decade later, based on weak evidence some doctors have adopted this strategy, although there is not yet agreement about its real benefit. In this opinion paper, weanalyze the methodological and plausibility problem beneath 'the Scratching Case'. This is also applicable to several other examples of spurious associations reported in the literature. In particular,weemphasize what should be done so as not to dilute evidence-based medicine by a vicious circle created by the over-exploitation of inadequate or insufficient data to compute incorrect or incomplete conclusions.
机译:子宫内膜刮擦或损伤是十年前首次提出的,旨在改善接受ART治疗的患者的子宫内膜接受性。十多年后,尽管证据尚不明确,但一些证据不足的医生还是采用了这种策略。在这篇意见书中,我们分析了“划痕案”下的方法论和合理性问题。这也适用于文献中报道的虚假关联的其他几个示例。特别是,我们强调应该做些什么,以免因过度利用不足或不足的数据来计算错误或不完整的结论而造成的恶性循环而稀释循证医学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号