首页> 外文期刊>Human Reproduction >Long-term outcome in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis initially randomized between expectant management and immediate treatment
【24h】

Long-term outcome in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis initially randomized between expectant management and immediate treatment

机译:患有不明原因的不育症和中期预后的夫妇的长期预后最初在预期治疗和即刻治疗之间随机分组

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: We recently reported that treatment with intrauterine insemination and controlled ovarian stimulation (IUI-COS) did not increase ongoing pregnancy rates compared with expectant management (EM) in couples with unexplained subfertility and intermediate prognosis of natural conception. Long-term cost-effectiveness of a policy of initial EM is unknown. We investigated whether the recommendation not to treat during the first 6 months is valid, regarding the long-term effectiveness and cumulative costs. METHODS: Couples with unexplained subfertility and intermediate prognosis of natural conception (n = 253, at 26 public clinics, the Netherlands) were randomly allocated to 6 months EM or immediate start with IUI-COS. The couples were then treated according to local protocol, usually IUI-COS followed by IVF. We followed couples until 3 years after randomization and registered pregnancies and resources used. Primary outcome was time to ongoing pregnancy. Secondary outcome was treatment costs. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Economic evaluation was performed from the perspective of the health care institution. RESULTS: Time to ongoing pregnancy did not differ between groups (log-rank test P = 0.98). Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates were 72-73% for EM and IUI-COS groups, respectively [relative risk 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.1)]. Estimated mean costs per couple were ?3424 (95% CI ?880-?5968) in the EM group and ?6040 (95% CI ?4055-?8125) in the IUI-COS group resulting in an estimated saving of ?2616 per couple (95% CI ?385-?4847) in favour of EM. CONCLUSIONS: In couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis of natural conception, initial EM for 6 months results in a considerable cost-saving with no delay in achieving pregnancy or jeopardizing the chance of pregnancy. Further comparisons between aggressive and milder forms of ovarian stimulation should be performed.
机译:背景:我们最近报道说,对于无法解释的低生育力和自然受孕中期预后的夫妇,与预期管理(EM)相比,宫腔内人工授精和控制性卵巢刺激(IUI-COS)治疗不会增加正在进行的妊娠率。初始EM策略的长期成本效益未知。我们就长期有效性和累积成本而言,调查了在头6个月内不予治疗的建议是否有效。方法:将具有无法解释的生育力和自然受孕的中间预后的夫妇(n = 253,在荷兰的26家公共诊所)随机分配为6个月EM或立即开始IUI-COS。然后根据当地协议对夫妇进行治疗,通常是IUI-COS,然后是IVF。我们追踪了夫妇直到随机分组后的3年,并记录了怀孕和使用的资源。主要结果是持续妊娠的时间。次要结果是治疗费用。分析是按意向性进行的。从卫生保健机构的角度进行了经济评估。结果:两组之间持续妊娠的时间无差异(对数秩检验P = 0.98)。 EM和IUI-COS组的持续妊娠累计发生率分别为72-73%[相对风险0.99(95%置信区间(CI)0.85-1.1)]。 EM组每对夫妇的估计平均成本为3424欧元(95%CI 880-5968),IUI-COS组为6040欧元(95%CI 4055-8512),每人平均节省2616欧元。夫妇(95%CI?385-?4847)支持EM。结论:对于无法解释的低生育力和自然受孕的中间预后的夫妇,初始EM治疗6个月可节省大量成本,并且不会延迟怀孕或危及怀孕的机会。应在侵略性和轻度形式的卵巢刺激之间进行进一步比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号