...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrometallurgy >Comparison of activated carbon and ion-exchange resins in recovering copper from cyanide leach solutions
【24h】

Comparison of activated carbon and ion-exchange resins in recovering copper from cyanide leach solutions

机译:活性炭和离子交换树脂从氰化物浸出液中回收铜的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of activated carbon and ion-exchange resins for recovering copper cyanide from gold leach solutions is compared in detail. When using activated carbon, the overall cyanide-to-copper ratio should be reduced to ~2 to achieve the most effective adsorption. This can be accomplished by dissolving metallic copper into the leach solution. However when using ion-exchange resins to recover the copper, it is not necessary to reduce the overall cyanide-to-copper ratio as the Cu(CN)_3~(2-) complex, which is most prevalent in leach solutions, can strongly adsorb onto the resin. Whilst the elution of copper from carbon is relatively simple, the elution of copper from the resins is challenging. Among a variety of elution systems investigated, a cyanide soak followed by NaCl elution appears to be the most elegant, with the advantage of no regeneration of the eluted resin being needed. Two closed loop elution flowsheets have been investigated to recover copper from ion-exchange resin, with each having a different impact on the removal of thiocyanate from the leach solution by the resin.
机译:详细比较了活性炭和离子交换树脂从金浸出溶液中回收氰化铜的用途。当使用活性炭时,总的氰化物与铜的比率应降低至〜2,以实现最有效的吸附。这可以通过将金属铜溶解到浸出溶液中来实现。但是,当使用离子交换树脂回收铜时,不必降低总氰化物与铜的比率,因为在浸提溶液中最常见的Cu(CN)_3〜(2-)络合物会强烈吸附到树脂上。尽管从碳中洗脱铜相对简单,但从树脂中洗脱铜却具有挑战性。在研究的各种洗脱系统中,氰化物浸泡后再用NaCl洗脱似乎是最优雅的方法,其优点是不需要再生洗脱树脂。为了从离子交换树脂中回收铜,已经研究了两个闭环洗脱流程图,每个流程图对树脂从浸出溶液中去除硫氰酸盐的影响不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号