首页> 外文期刊>Human Genetics >Comparison of the DNA methylation profiles of human peripheral blood cells and transformed B-lymphocytes.
【24h】

Comparison of the DNA methylation profiles of human peripheral blood cells and transformed B-lymphocytes.

机译:人类外周血细胞和转化的B淋巴细胞的DNA甲基化图谱比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Epidemiological studies of DNA methylation (DNAm) profiles may hold substantial promise for identifying mechanisms through which genetic and environmental factors jointly contribute to disease risk. Different cell types are likely to have different DNAm patterns. We investigate the DNAm differences between two types of biospecimens available in many genetic epidemiology studies. We compared DNAm patterns in two different DNA samples from each of 34 participants in the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy study (20 Caucasians and 14 African-Americans). One was extracted from peripheral blood cells (PBC) and the other from transformed B-lymphocytes (TBL). The genome-wide DNAm profiles were compared at over 27,000 genome-wide methylation sites. We found that 26 out of the 34 participants had correlation coefficients higher than 0.9 between methylation profiles of PBC and TBL. Although a high correlation was observed in the DNAm profile between PBC and TBL, we also observed variation across samples from different DNA resources and donors. Using principal component analysis of the DNAm profiles, the two sources of the DNA samples could be accurately predicted. We also identified 3,723 autosomal DNAm sites that had significantly different methylation statuses in PBC compared to TBL (Bonferroni corrected p value <0.05). Both PBC and TBL provide a rich resource for understanding the DNAm profiles in humans participating in epidemiologic studies. While the majority of DNAm findings in PBC and TBL may be consistent, caution must be used when interpreting results because of the possibility of cell type-specific methylation modification.
机译:DNA甲基化(DNAm)分布图的流行病学研究可能会为确定遗传和环境因素共同导致疾病风险的机制具有广阔的前景。不同的细胞类型可能具有不同的DNAm模式。我们调查了许多遗传流行病学研究中可用的两种生物标本之间的DNAm差异。我们比较了来自动脉病遗传流行病学网络研究(34位白种人和14位非裔美国人)的34位参与者中每位参与者的两个不同DNA样本中的DNAm模式。一种是从外周血细胞(PBC)中提取的,另一种是从转化的B淋巴细胞(TBL)中提取的。在超过27,000个全基因组甲基化位点比较了全基因组DNAm谱。我们发现,在34名参与者中,有26名的PBC和TBL甲基化谱之间的相关系数高于0.9。尽管在PBC和TBL之间的DNAm谱图中观察到高度相关性,但我们还观察到了来自不同DNA资源和供体的样品之间的差异。使用DNAm图谱的主成分分析,可以准确预测DNA样品的两种来源。我们还确定了3723个常染色体DNAm位点,与TBL相比,PBC中的甲基化状态显着不同(Bonferroni校正的p值<0.05)。 PBC和TBL都为了解参与流行病学研究的人类DNAm谱提供了丰富的资源。虽然PBC和TBL中大多数DNAm的发现可能是一致的,但在解释结果时必须谨慎,因为可能发生细胞类型特异性甲基化修饰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号