首页> 外文期刊>HortTechnology >Substrate Temperature in Plastic and Alternative Nursery Containers
【24h】

Substrate Temperature in Plastic and Alternative Nursery Containers

机译:塑料和其他苗圃容器中的基材温度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The green industry has identified the use of biodegradable containers as an alternative to plastic containers as a way to improve the sustainability of-current production systems. Field trials were conducted to evaluate the performance of four types of 1 -gal nursery biocontainers [keratin (KR), wood pulp (WP), fabric (FB), and coir fiber (Coir)] in comparison with standard black plastic (Plastic) containers on substrate temperature, water use, and biomass production in aboveground nurseries. Locations in Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, and Texas were selected to conduct experiments during May to Oct. 2012 using 'Green Velvet' boxwood (Buxus sempervirens x B. microphylla) and 'Dark Knight' bluebeard (Caryopteris x clandonensis) in 2013. In this article, we were focusing on the impact of alternative container materials on hourly substrate temperature variations and plant growth. Substrate temperature was on an average higher (about 6 degrees C) in Plastic containers (about 36 degrees C) compared with that in WP, FB, and Coir containers. However, substrate temperature in KR containers was similar to Plastic. Substrate temperature was also influenced by local weather conditions with the highest substrate temperatures recorded in Texas followed by Kentucky, Mississippi, and Michigan. Laboratory and controlled environment trials using test containers were conducted in Kentucky to evaluate sidewall porosity and evaporation loss to confirm field observations. Substrate temperature was similar under laboratory simulation compared with field studies with the highest substrate temperature observed in Plastic and KR, intermediate in WP and lowest in FB and Coir. Side wall temperature was higher in Plastic, KR, and FB compared with WP and Coir, while side wall water loss was greatest in FB, intermediate in WP and Coir, and lowest in plastic and KR. These observations suggest that the contribution of sidewall water loss to overall container evapotranspiration has a major influence on reducing substrate temperature. The porous nature of some of the alternative containers increased water use, but reduced heat stress and enhanced plant survival under hot summer conditions. The greater drying rate of alterative containers especially in hot and dry locations could demand increased irrigation volume, more frequent irrigation, or both, which could adversely affect the economic and environmental sustainability of alternative containers.
机译:绿色产业已经确定使用可生物降解的容器替代塑料容器,以改善现有生产系统的可持续性。与标准的黑色塑料(​​塑料)相比,进行了现场试验以评估四种类型的1-gal育苗生物容器的性能[角蛋白(KR),木浆(WP),织物(FB)和椰壳纤维(Coir)]。容器,以了解地上苗圃的基质温度,用水量和生物量生产情况。在2013年5月至2012年10月,选择了肯塔基州,密歇根州,密西西比州和德克萨斯州的地点进行实验,使用的是“绿色天鹅绒”黄杨木(Buxus sempervirens x B. microphylla)和“深色骑士”蓝胡子(Caryopteris x clandonensis)。在本文中,我们重点研究了替代容器材料对每小时底材温度变化和植物生长的影响。与WP,FB和Coir容器相比,塑料容器(约36摄氏度)中的基材温度平均较高(约6摄氏度)。但是,KR容器中的基材温度与塑料相似。基材温度还受当地天气状况的影响,德克萨斯州记录的基材温度最高,其次是肯塔基州,密西西比州和密歇根州。在肯塔基州进行了使用测试容器的实验室和受控环境试验,以评估井壁孔隙度和蒸发损失,从而确认现场观察结果。在实验室模拟中,底物温度与实地研究相近,在Plastic和KR中观察到最高的底物温度,在WP中处于中间,在FB和Coir中则最低。与WP和Coir相比,Plastic,KR和FB的侧壁温度更高,而FB的侧壁失水量最大,WP和Coir处于中间,而Plastic和KR则最低。这些观察结果表明,侧壁失水对整个容器蒸散量的影响对降低基底温度有重大影响。一些替代容器的多孔性增加了用水量,但在炎热的夏季条件下减少了热应力并提高了植物的存活率。备用容器的干燥速度更高,尤其是在炎热和干燥的地方,可能需要增加灌溉量,更频繁的灌溉或两者兼而有之,这可能会对替代容器的经济和环境可持续性产生不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号