首页> 外文期刊>HortTechnology >Initial response of 'Concord' and 'Sunbelt' grapes to pruning and fruit thinning.
【24h】

Initial response of 'Concord' and 'Sunbelt' grapes to pruning and fruit thinning.

机译:“ Concord”和“ Sunbelt”葡萄对修剪和疏果的初步反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Balanced, dormant hand pruning was compared with minimal and machine box-cut pruning with no fruit thinning, thinning at 27 to 45 days postbloom, or thinning at veraison on Vitis labruscana grape cultivars, Concord and Sunbelt. Weekly berry weights measured during the growing season showed that minimally pruned 'Concord' and 'Sunbelt' generally had lower berry weights than hand-pruned vines. Lag phase occurred 50+or-7 days postbloom in 'Concord' and 58+or-7 days postbloom in 'Sunbelt'. The duration of harvest period was longer for 'Concord' than 'Sunbelt', and minimally pruned vines without thinning had the most delayed ripening regardless of cultivar or time of fruit thinning. The desired soluble solids of 17% for 'Concord' and 18% for 'Sunbelt' were achieved without differences in other fruit composition parameters on all treatments. Delaying harvest of minimally pruned vines without thinning by about 7 days was required to achieve the desired soluble solids. Pruning methods had more effect on yield components than time of thinning. At harvest, minimally pruned vines had lower cluster weights, berry weights, and yield per node compared with hand pruning in both cultivars and years. In terms of second year yield response, 'Sunbelt' was not as detrimentally impacted by machine and minimal pruning without thinning compared with 'Concord'. Preliminary results indicate that machine and minimal pruning with and without thinning are viable alternatives to hand pruning for 'Concord' and 'Sunbelt' grapes in irrigated vineyards with warm, long growing seasons.
机译:比较了平衡,休眠状态的手动修剪与最小化和机器开箱式修剪的结果,该修剪没有水果稀疏,开花后27至45天稀疏,或者在 Vitis labruscana 葡萄品种,康科德和Sunbelt上稀疏。在生长季节每周测量的浆果重量显示,修剪最少的“ Concord”和“ Sunbelt”通常比手工修剪的葡萄具有更低的浆果重量。滞后阶段在“康科德”花后50+或7天发生,在“ Sunbelt”中花后58+或-7天发生。 “协和”的收获期比“阳光带”的收获期长,无论稀疏品种或疏果时间如何,不稀疏的修剪最少的葡萄藤最迟延成熟。在所有处理中,“ Concord”和“ Sunbelt”的理想可溶性固形物含量均为17%,“ Sunbelt”为18%,其他水果组成参数均无差异。为了获得所需的可溶性固形物,需要延迟收获最少修剪的葡萄树而不需稀疏约7天。修剪方法对产量成分的影响大于间隔时间。在收获时,与人工修剪相比,在品种和年份中,最少修剪的葡萄藤具有较低的簇重,浆果重量和每节产量。就第二年的产量响应而言,与“ Concord”相比,“ Sunbelt”不受机器和最小修剪而不会减薄的不利影响。初步结果表明,在温暖,生长季节长的灌溉葡萄园中,机械修剪和最小修剪(带或不带稀疏)是“ Concord”和“ Sunbelt”葡萄手工修剪的可行替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号