...
首页> 外文期刊>HortScience >Efficacy of Two Dithiopyr Formulations for Control of Smooth Crabgrass [Digitaria ischaemum (Schreb) Schreb. ex Muhl.] at Various Stages of Growth
【24h】

Efficacy of Two Dithiopyr Formulations for Control of Smooth Crabgrass [Digitaria ischaemum (Schreb) Schreb. ex Muhl.] at Various Stages of Growth

机译:两种Dithiopyr制剂控制光滑蟹草的功效[Digitaria ischaemum(Schreb)Schreb。在不同的成长阶段]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although dithiopyr has been used for smooth crabgrass [Digitaria ischaemum (Schreb) Schreb. ex Muhl] control for many years, data describing the efficacy of a new, water-based formulation of dithiopyr for smooth crabgrass control are limited. Research was conducted in Knoxville, TN, and Griffin, GA, evaluating water-based and wettable powder dithiopyr formulations at 0.56 and 0.43 kg.ha(-1) for smooth crabgrass control when applied at the pre-emergence (PRE), one- to two-leaf (1LF), one- to two-tiller (1TL), and greater than three-tiller (3TL) stages of growth. These treatments were compared with quinclorac (0.84 kg.ha(-1)) applied at the same POST timings (i.e., 1LF, 1TL, and 3TL). When applied PRE, all dithiopyr treatments provided greater than 85% smooth crabgrass control at the end of the trial in both locations. At the 1LF stage, both rates and formulations of dithiopyr provided greater than 93% smooth crabgrass control at 4 weeks after application and greater than 77% at the end of the trial. Applied at the 1TL stage in Tennessee, no differences in smooth crabgrass control were detected between quinclorac and any dithiopyr treatment at the end of the trial; when applied in Georgia at the 1TL stage, quinclorac provided greater smooth crabgrass control at the end of the trial than either rate or formulation of dithiopyr. Although no differences were detected between any dithiopyr treatment and. quinclorac applied at the 3TL stage in Tennessee,, smooth crabgrass control at the end of the trial measured less than 70% for all treatments. At the end of the trial in Georgia, smooth crabgrass control with quinclorac (91%) was greater than both formulations of dithiopyr. These findings suggest that both the wettable powder and water-based formulations of dithiopyr can be used to effectively control smooth crabgrass at the PRE and 1LF stages of growth, but quinclorac should be selected over dithiopyr for control of tillering smooth crabgrass plants. Turfgrass managers should implement smooth crabgrass control measures at PRE and 1LF timings, because erratic responses can be observed with both dithiopyr and quinclorac applications to smooth crabgrass after tillering. Chemical names used: dithiopyr (S,S-dimethyl 2-(difluoromethyl)-4-(2-methylpropyl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)-3,5-pyridinedicarbothioate); quinclorac (3,7-dichloro-8-quinolinecarboxylic acid).
机译:尽管将二硫代吡啶用于光滑的马尾草[Digitaria ischaemum(Schreb)Schreb。多年以来的控制,描述新型水基二硫代吡喃酯对平滑马尾草控制效果的数据有限。在田纳西州诺克斯维尔和佐治亚州格里芬进行了研究,评估了萌发前(PRE)施用0.56和0.43 kg.ha(-1)的水基和可湿性粉状二硫代吡喃酯配方对平滑马尾草的控制效果。到两叶(1LF),一到两耕种(1TL)和大于三耕种(3TL)的生长阶段。将这些处理方法与在相同POST时机(即1LF,1TL和3TL)上应用的喹氯拉克(0.84 kg.ha(-1))进行了比较。当使用PRE时,所有二硫吡py治疗在试验结束时在两个位置均提供了大于85%的平滑马尾草防治效果。在1LF阶段,施用二硫吡py的比率和制剂在施用后4周提供了超过93%的平滑马尾草控制效果,在试验结束时提供了77%的平滑率。在田纳西州的1TL阶段应用时,在试验结束时,在喹氯拉克和任何二硫代吡treatment治疗之间未观察到顺滑的马尾草控制差异;当在1TL阶段在佐治亚州使用时,在试验结束时,奎尼克拉克比二硫吡rate的使用量或剂型能更好地控制马尾草。尽管在任何二硫吡py治疗之间均未发现差异。在田纳西州的3TL阶段应用quinclorac,在试验结束时对所有草草进行的平滑马尾草控制均不到70%。在佐治亚州的试验结束时,喹氯拉克(91%)对马尾草的防治效果要好于二硫吡thio的两种配方。这些发现表明,二硫吡喃的可湿性粉剂和水基制剂均可用于在生长的PRE和1LF阶段有效控制光滑的马尾草,但应选择喹硫菌而不是dithiopyr来控制分smooth光滑的马尾草植物。草坪草管理者应在PRE和1LF时机实施平滑的草屑控制措施,因为在分ing后,使用二硫吡咯和喹克罗拉施用可使草屑平滑,因此观察到不稳定的响应。使用的化学名称:二硫代吡啶(S,S-二甲基2-(二氟甲基)-4-(2-甲基丙基)-6-(三氟甲基)-3,5-吡啶二硫代硫酸盐);喹克洛拉克(3,7-二氯-8-喹啉羧酸)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号