首页> 外文期刊>History of the human sciences >Foucault's and Arendt's 'insider view' of biopolitics: a critique of Agamben
【24h】

Foucault's and Arendt's 'insider view' of biopolitics: a critique of Agamben

机译:福柯和阿伦特对生物政治的“内部观点”:对阿甘本的批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article revisits Arendt's and Foucault's converging accounts of modern (bio)politics and the entry of biological life into politics. Agamben's influential account of these ideas is rejected as a misrepresentation both because it de-historicizes biological/organic life and because it occludes the positivity of that life and thus the discursive appeal and performative force of biopolitics. Through attention to the genealogy of Arendt's and Foucault's own ideas we will see that the major point of convergence in their thinking is their insistence upon understanding biological thinking from the inside, in terms of its positivity. Agamben's assessment of modern politics is closer to Arendt's than it is to Foucault's and this marks a fascinating point of disagreement between Arendt and Foucault. Whereas Arendt sees the normalizing force of modern society as being in total opposition to individuality, Foucault posits totalization and individuation as processes of normation, which casts a light upon the relative import they place upon politics and ethics.
机译:本文回顾了阿伦特和福柯关于现代(生物)政治的融合论述以及生物生命进入政治的观点。阿甘本对这些想法的有影响力的解释被误认为是错误的陈述,因为它使生物/有机生活变得非历史化,并且因为它掩盖了这种生活的积极性,因而阻碍了生物政治的话语吸引力和执行力。通过关注阿伦特和福柯自己思想的家谱,我们将看到他们思想融合的主要点是他们坚持从内部理解生物学思想的积极性。阿甘本对现代政治的评估更接近阿伦特,而不是福柯,这标志着阿伦特和福柯之间的一个令人着迷的分歧。阿伦特认为现代社会的规范化力量完全反对个性,而福柯则认为总体化和个性化是规范化的过程,这为他们对政治和道德的相对重要性提供了启示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号