【24h】

THE UNDEAD DARWIN: ICONIC NARRATIVE, SCIENTIFIC CONTROVERSY AND THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE

机译:亡灵达尔文:传奇性的叙事,科学之争和科学史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For historians of science, Charles Darwin is unique for at least one reason. Onehundred and twenty-seven years after his death, the figure of Darwin still has acrucial role to play in the debates of modern science. In contrast, most of the othercharacters who have contributed to, or fundamentally transformed, the histories ofthe sciences remain well known only to their historians. Even figures such as IsaacNewton or Antoine Lavoisier are, for modern physicists and chemists, little morethan names in textbooks for introductory science courses, familiar as part of an originstory, but long since surpassed by their posterity. Darwin's shade is treated very dif-ferently, retaining a place at the heart of the discussions of today's biologists, bothin their public discourse and in their private disputations. In this short article, I wantto explore the appearance of Darwin in one particular modern scientific controversy,and to consider the reasons for his manifestation, before examining the potentialconsequences that this might have for the public face of the history and sociologyof science. As I will show, Darwin's presence in public life does not just reflect hisimportance to the history of science, but is the result of a long process in which therelationship between science and religion has been at the heart of civic debates. Assuch, the field of Darwin studies not only has potentially greater ramifications thando other areas of the history of science, but arguably, its practitioners have greaterresponsibilities to respond to the mobilisation of Darwin's name and reputation.
机译:对于科学史学家来说,查尔斯·达尔文之所以独特,至少出于一个原因。达尔文逝世一百二十七年后,他在现代科学辩论中仍然发挥着重要作用。相反,大多数对科学史做出贡献或从根本上改变了其他特征的人,只有其历史学家才知道。对于现代物理学家和化学家来说,甚至像艾萨克·牛顿(IsaacNewton)或安托万·拉瓦西耶(Antoine Lavoisier)这样的人物,在入门级科学课程的教科书中也只不过是起源故事的一部分而已,但很久以来就被后代所取代。达尔文的阴影非常不同,无论是在公开讨论还是在私人讨论中,都在当今生物学家讨论的核心中占有一席之地。在这篇简短的文章中,我想探讨一下达尔文在一个特殊的现代科学争论中的出现,并考虑其出现的原因,然后再研究这可能对科学历史和社会学的公众面貌产生的潜在后果。正如我将要说明的那样,达尔文在公共生活中的存在不仅反映了他对科学历史的重要性,而且是科学和宗教之间的关系一直是公民辩论的核心的漫长过程的结果。因此,达尔文研究领域不仅比科学历史的其他领域具有更大的潜在影响,而且可以说,它的从业者对动员达尔文的名字和声誉负有更大的责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号