首页> 外文期刊>Health affairs >Differences between integrated and stand-alone E-prescribing systems have implications for future use.
【24h】

Differences between integrated and stand-alone E-prescribing systems have implications for future use.

机译:集成式电子处方系统与独立式电子处方系统之间的差异会对将来的使用产生影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Understanding the benefits of electronic prescribing systems has important implications for quality and efficiency in medical care. We surveyed physicians about their use of e-prescribing in outpatient practices. We found that physicians who use e-prescribing systems integrated into an electronic health record have different characteristics, usage patterns, perceived benefits, and levels of satisfaction than physicians who use stand-alone systems. For example, although only 56 percent of the physicians we surveyed said that they checked a patient's drug history most or all of the time when writing a prescription, those with integrated systems were significantly more likely to report doing so than their counterparts with stand-alone systems. Our findings have implications for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act's requirements for e-prescribing and the future use of this technology. Because many stand-alone systems cannot meet meaningful-use requirements, there is likely to be a shift toward integrated systems.
机译:了解电子处方系统的好处对医疗质量和效率具有重要意义。我们调查了医生在门诊实践中使用电子处方的情况。我们发现,与使用独立系统的医生相比,使用集成到电子健康记录中的电子处方系统的医生具有不同的特征,使用模式,可感知的收益和满意度。例如,尽管我们接受调查的医生中只有56%的人说他们在处方时大部分或全部时间都在检查患者的药物史,但集成系统的医生比独立医生的报告的可能性要大得多。系统。我们的发现对《美国复苏与再投资法案》(American Recovery and Reinvestment Act)对电子处方的要求以及该技术的未来使用具有影响。由于许多独立系统无法满足有意义的使用要求,因此可能会转向集成系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号