首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >Generic and specialist nursing roles in the community: an investigation of professional and lay views.
【24h】

Generic and specialist nursing roles in the community: an investigation of professional and lay views.

机译:社区中的普通和专业护理角色:对专业意见和非专业意见的调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the UK, a number of policy documents have sought to outline and clarify the role of the community nurse in the past 10 years. Furthermore, the increasing specialisation of community nursing has been the topic of much debate in the UK and Ireland. The present study aimed to investigate the perceptions of community nurses, general practitioners (GPs), members of the public, and senior strategists and policy-makers in relation to specialist and generalist nursing roles within community nursing in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Focus groups were undertaken with community nurses (n = 38), GPs (n = 14) and public representatives (n = 8). This was followed by a two-stage Delphi investigation using self-report questionnaires with the same samples. In addition, data were collected from 34 senior policy-makers using a semi-structured interview schedule. The results uncovered a mix of views. While there was much negativity about specialisation, the participants felt that the move away from generalism was unavoidable. There was concern that specialisation, whilst welcome in some areas, would lead to role conflict, role overlap and role confusion. Findings from this study have the potential to inform the specialisation-generalism debate within and outside the UK and Ireland. Recommendations are suggested for future policy and practice.
机译:在英国,许多政策文件试图概述和阐明社区护士在过去10年中的作用。此外,在英国和爱尔兰,社区护理专业化程度的提高已成为许多争论的话题。本研究旨在调查在北爱尔兰和爱尔兰共和国,社区护士,全科医生(GPs),公众,高级策略师和政策制定者对社区护理中专家和全科医生护理作用的看法。与社区护士(n = 38),全科医生(n = 14)和公共代表(n = 8)进行了焦点小组讨论。随后是两阶段的德尔菲调查,使用带有相同样本的自我报告调查表。此外,还使用半结构化访谈时间表从34位高级决策者那里收集了数据。结果揭示了多种观点。尽管专业化存在很多消极因素,但与会人员认为摆脱通用主义是不可避免的。有人担心,专业化虽然在某些领域受到欢迎,但会导致角色冲突,角色重叠和角色混乱。这项研究的发现有可能为英国和爱尔兰内外的专业普遍主义辩论提供参考。提出了有关未来政策和实践的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号