首页> 外文期刊>Heredity: An International Journal of Genetics >Comparing Bayesian estimates of genetic differentiation of molecular markers and quantitative traits: an application to Pinus sylvestris
【24h】

Comparing Bayesian estimates of genetic differentiation of molecular markers and quantitative traits: an application to Pinus sylvestris

机译:比较贝叶斯估计的分子标记和数量性状的遗传分化:樟子松的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Comparison of the level of differentiation at neutral molecular markers (estimated as F-ST or G(ST)) with the level of differentiation at quantitative traits ( estimated as Q(ST)) has become a standard tool for inferring that there is differential selection between populations. We estimated Q(ST) of timing of bud set from a latitudinal cline of Pinus sylvestris with a Bayesian hierarchical variance component method utilizing the information on the pre-estimated population structure from neutral molecular markers. Unfortunately, the between-family variances differed substantially between populations that resulted in a bimodal posterior of Q(ST) that could not be compared in any sensible way with the unimodal posterior of the microsatellite F-ST. In order to avoid publishing studies with flawed Q(ST) estimates, we recommend that future studies should present heritability estimates for each trait and population. Moreover, to detect variance heterogeneity in frequentist methods ( ANOVA and REML), it is of essential importance to check also that the residuals are normally distributed and do not follow any systematically deviating trends.
机译:比较中性分子标记的分化水平(估计为F-ST或G(ST))和定量性状的分化水平(估计为Q(ST))已成为推断存在差异选择的标准工具。人口之间。我们利用来自中性分子标记物的预先估计的种群结构信息,利用贝叶斯分级方差分量方法,从樟子松的纬度系中估计出蕾的时序的Q(ST)。不幸的是,族群之间的差异在群体之间存在很大差异,导致Q(ST)的双峰后验,因此无法以任何明智的方式与微卫星F-ST的单峰后验进行比较。为了避免发表带有错误的Q(ST)估计值的研究,我们建议以后的研究应针对每个特征和种群提出遗传力估计值。此外,为了检测频繁性方法(方差分析和REML)中的方差异质性,同样重要的是检查残差是否正态分布且不遵循任何系统偏离趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号