首页> 外文期刊>Healthcare Benchmarks and Quality Improvement >VAP: Just how good a benchmark is it really?
【24h】

VAP: Just how good a benchmark is it really?

机译:VAP:基准到底有多好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The headline pulls no punches. It reads: "Ventilator-associated pneumonia - the wrong quality measure for benchmarking."l This stunning beadline, which heralded a "Perspective" article in a recent edition of Annals of Internal Medicine, will no doubt grab the attention of quality improvement experts. After all, no lesser organization than the Institute for Healthcare Improvement included V AP, or ventilator-associated pneumonia, as a key objective in its "100,000 Lives Campaign," and YAP is also being considered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and The Joint Commission. Any number of hospitals have pursued and then trumpeted their successful reduction of V AP rates.
机译:头条新闻不容小punch。上面写着:“呼吸机相关性肺炎-基准测试的错误质量度量。” l这一惊人的前言预示了最新一版的《内科学年鉴》中的“ Perspective”一文,无疑将吸引质量改进专家的注意。毕竟,不低于医疗保健改善协会的组织将V AP或呼吸机相关性肺炎作为其“ 100,000生命运动”的主要目标,而且Medicare&Medicaid Services中心和联合委员会。许多医院都追求并成功降低了V AP率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号