首页> 外文期刊>Harvard international law journal >Human Rights Class Actions: Rethinking the Pilot-Judgment Procedure at the European Court of Human Rights
【24h】

Human Rights Class Actions: Rethinking the Pilot-Judgment Procedure at the European Court of Human Rights

机译:人权集体诉讼:对欧洲人权法院的审判程序的反思

获取原文
       

摘要

For decades, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has served as a bright beacon of hope for advancing human rights. Yet in recent years, a flood of applications has threatened to drown the institution entirely. In an effort to stay afloat amid the growing tide of cases, the Court instituted the so-called "pilot-judgment procedure." Through this procedure, the Court attempts to address systemic violations on the domestic level that give rise to large numbers of repetitive applications by adjudicating an individual case. The procedure addresses the problems created by repetitive applications, which overburden the Court and cause delays in hearing individual applications that raise novel and grave human rights violations, thereby impeding the Court's efforts to protect individual human rights. The pilot-judgment technique has been heralded as a bold and innovative response to these problems and has succeeded in stemming the tide of cases.
机译:几十年来,欧洲人权法院一直是促进人权的光明灯塔。然而,近年来,大量申请威胁着该机构的整体淹没。为了在不断增长的案件浪潮中维持生计,法院制定了所谓的“审判程序”。通过这一程序,法院试图通过裁决一个案件来解决国内范围内引起大量重复申请的系统性侵权行为。该程序解决了重复性申请所造成的问题,这些问题使法院负担沉重,并导致审理提出新颖和严重侵犯人权行为的个人申请延误,从而阻碍了法院保护个人人权的努力。飞行员审判技术被认为是对这些问题的大胆而创新的反应,并成功地阻止了案件的浪潮。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号