首页> 外文期刊>Harvard international law journal >Who's Got the Title? or, The Remnants of Debellatio in Post-Invasion Iraq
【24h】

Who's Got the Title? or, The Remnants of Debellatio in Post-Invasion Iraq

机译:谁获得了头衔?或者,入侵后伊拉克的叛乱残余

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The invasion of Iraq by the British and U.S.-led Coalition forces in March 2003 silently effected debellatio, the ancient doctrine by which a military victor takes title to territory in which the defeated government has ceased to function. The Coalition governments' failure to recognize it as such and to invoke the attendant legal consequences enabled destructive chaos on the ground and created a troubling precedent for the application of international law to any future exercise of one sovereign state's authority within the geographical boundaries of another sovereign state. The Coalition forces ostensibly acted pursuant to the international law of occupation, but the legal framework ultimately agreed upon and actually utilized in post-invasion Iraq more closely resembles debellatio. Though this doctrine traditionally is associated with conquest and annexation, it need not be; as updated by modern ideas of self-determination and what I call "sovereign identity," it is in fact the extant doctrine most consistent with the factual and legal situation caused by the invasion.
机译:2003年3月,由英国和美国领导的联军入侵伊拉克,悄无声息地产生了叛逆。叛乱是一种古老的学说,军事胜利者凭此拥有被击败的政府已经停止运作的领土的所有权。联合政府未能意识到这一点并没有引起随之而来的法律后果,这在当地造成了破坏性的混乱,并为将国际法适用于将来在另一主权国家的地理范围内行使一个主权国家的权力的做法开创了令人不安的先例。州。联军表面上是按照国际占领法行事的,但最终达成协议并在入侵伊拉克后实际使用的法律框架更像是叛乱。尽管该学说传统上与征服和吞并有关,但不一定如此;现代自我决定思想和我所谓的“主权身份”更新了这一事实,实际上,这是现存的教义,与入侵造成的事实和法律状况最一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号