...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society >Use of electrical coupling information in AF catheter ablation:A prospective randomized pilot study
【24h】

Use of electrical coupling information in AF catheter ablation:A prospective randomized pilot study

机译:电耦合信息在房颤导管消融中的应用:一项前瞻性随机试验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND Catheter contact is important for radiofrequency (RF) ablation. Local electrical, catheter-to-tissue coupling has been described as a tool to objectively measure contact.OBJECTIVE We hypothesized that pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation using electrical coupling information (ECI) would yield higher rates of PVI than an approach without ECI.METHODS Forty patients with atrial fibrillation were prospectively included. In each patient, 1 pair of pulmonary veins (PVs) was randomly chosen to be encircled with ECI available while the other pair was encircled without use of ECI.RESULTS The rate of PVI was significantly higher in PVs encircled with ECI available (58% vs 30%; P = .024). PV encircling with coupling resulted in slightly longer procedure (26.5 [interquartile range {IQR} 22-32.5] vs 23.5 [IQR 19-26.5] minutes; P = .019), fluoroscopy (9.0 [IQR 6-12] vs 6.9 [IQR 4-8.6] minutes; P = .011), and RF (20.0 [IQR 16.5-23.5] vs 17.3 [IQR 15.1-20.6] minutes; P = .015) times. For nonisolated PVs, the coupling group had significantly fewer gaps (3.0 [IQR 1.8-7] vs 6.0 [IQR 4-11];P = 0.021) and gap mapping/closure needed shorter procedure (9.0 [IQR 4-16] vs 13.0 [IQR 11-21] minutes; P = .04), fluoroscopy (3.9 [IQR 2-7.1] vs 6.0 [IQR 4.6-7.9] minutes; P = .038), and RF (1.9 [IQR 0.9-5] vs 5.2 [IQR 3.3-8.6] minutes; P = .016) times.CONCLUSIONS The use of ECI improved lesion deployment measured as higher rates of PVI after anatomical encircling. For nonisolated PVs, fewer gaps and faster gap closure were found using ECI.
机译:背景技术导管的接触对于射频消融很重要。导管到组织之间的局部电耦合已被描述为一种客观测量接触的工具。目的我们假设,使用电耦合信息(ECI)进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)消融将比无ECI的方法产生更高的PVI率。方法前瞻性纳入40例房颤患者。在每位患者中,随机选择一对肺静脉(PVs)进行ECI包围,而另一对在不使用ECI的情况下进行包围。结果:在可用ECI包围的PV中,PVI的比率明显更高(58%vs 30%; P = .024)。 PV环绕耦合导致操作过程稍长(26.5 [四分位间距{IQR} 22-32.5]分钟与23.5 [IQR 19-26.5]分钟; P = .019),荧光检查(9.0 [IQR 6-12] vs 6.9 [IQR]) 4-8.6]分钟; P = .011)和RF(20.0 [IQR 16.5-23.5]分钟vs 17.3 [IQR 15.1-20.6]分钟; P = .015)分钟。对于非隔离的PV,偶联组的缺口明显更少(3.0 [IQR 1.8-7]比6.0 [IQR 4-11]; P = 0.021),缺口映射/封闭需要更短的过程(9.0 [IQR 4-16]比13.0) [IQR 11-21]分钟; P = .04),荧光检查(3.9 [IQR 2-7.1]分钟vs 6.0 [IQR 4.6-7.9]分钟; P = .038)和RF(1.9 [IQR 0.9-5] vs结论:5.2 [IQR 3.3-8.6]分钟; P = .016)次。结论ECI的使用改善了病灶的部署,因为解剖包围后PVI的发生率更高。对于非隔离的PV,使用ECI可以发现更少的间隙和更快的间隙闭合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号