首页> 外文期刊>Health services research: HSR >European long-term care programs: Lessons for community living assistance services and supports?
【24h】

European long-term care programs: Lessons for community living assistance services and supports?

机译:欧洲长期护理计划:社区生活援助服务和支持的经验教训?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To uncover lessons from abroad for Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS), a federally run voluntary public long-term care (LTC) insurance program created under the Accountable Care Act of 2010. Data Sources Program administrators and policy researchers from Austria, England, France, Germany, and the Netherlands. Study Design Qualitative methods focused on key parameters of cash for care: how programs set benefit levels; project expenditures; control administrative costs; regulate the use of benefits; and protect workers. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Structured discussions were conducted during an international conference of LTC experts, followed by personal meetings and individual correspondence. Principal Findings Germany's self-financing mandate and tight targeting of benefits have resulted in a solvent program with low premiums. Black markets for care are likely in the absence of regulation; France addresses this via a unique system ensuing legal payment of workers. Conclusions Programs in the five countries studied have lessons, both positive and negative, relevant to CLASS design.
机译:目的是为了了解国外的社区生活援助服务和支持课程(CLASS),这是根据2010年《责任关怀法》创建的联邦政府自愿提供的公共长期护理(LTC)保险计划。数据源计划管理员和政策研究人员来自奥地利,英格兰,法国,德国和荷兰。研究设计定性方法侧重于护理用现金的关键参数:计划如何设定福利水平;项目支出;控制行政费用;规范福利的使用;并保护工人。数据收集/提取方法在LTC专家的一次国际会议上进行了结构化的讨论,然后进行了个人会议和个人通信。 Principal Findings德国的自负资金要求和严格的福利目标导致了具有低保费的偿付能力计划。在缺乏监管的情况下,医疗黑市可能会出现;法国通过确保工人合法付款的独特系统解决了这一问题。结论在所研究的五个国家中的课程都具有与CLASS设计相关的正面和负面教训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号