...
首页> 外文期刊>Health economics >FUNDING HIV-VACCINE RESEARCH IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES-WHAT IS WRONG WITH IAVFs RECOMMENDATION?
【24h】

FUNDING HIV-VACCINE RESEARCH IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES-WHAT IS WRONG WITH IAVFs RECOMMENDATION?

机译:在发展中国家资助艾滋病毒疫苗研究-IAVF建议书有什么不对的地方?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The International AIDS Vaccine Initiative recommends targeting resources to research institutions in developing countries in order to accelerate the development of an effective HIV vaccine. In contrast, this paper shows that neither lump-sum nor in-kind transfers are an effective policy. We analyze several financing mechanisms as a means to overcome the lack of depth in HlV-vaccine research in a non-cooperative framework. At first, we point to cases in which financial support is actually counterproductive. Then we analyze whether in-kind transfers are preferable to lump-sum transfers. Even if donors prefer aid in kind because the incentives for moral hazard of recipients can be reduced, we demonstrate that it is effective only if recipients have cost advantages.
机译:国际艾滋病疫苗倡议建议将资源分配给发展中国家的研究机构,以加速开发有效的艾滋病疫苗。相反,本文表明,一次性支付和实物转移都不是有效的政策。我们分析了几种筹资机制,以克服在非合作框架下HIV疫苗研究缺乏深度的方法。首先,我们指出了财务支持实际上适得其反的情况。然后,我们分析实物转账是否比一次性转账更可取。即使捐赠者之所以喜欢实物援助,是因为可以减少受助者道德风险的诱因,我们证明,只有在受援者具有成本优势的情况下,该援助才有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号