首页> 外文期刊>Health education research >Fair and just or just fair? Examining models of government-not-for-profit engagement under the Australian Social Inclusion Agenda
【24h】

Fair and just or just fair? Examining models of government-not-for-profit engagement under the Australian Social Inclusion Agenda

机译:公平而公正还是公正?审查《澳大利亚社会融合议程》下的政府非营利组织参与模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper explores the interrelationship between two contemporary policy debates: one focused on the social determinants of health and the other on social (inclusion) policy within contemporary welfare regimes. In both debates, academics and policy makers alike are grappling with the balance between universal and targeted policy initiatives and the role of local 'delivery' organizations in promoting health and social equality. In this paper, we discuss these debates in the context of a recent social policy initiative in Australia: the Social Inclusion Agenda. We examine two proposed models of engagement between the government and the not-for-profit welfare sector for the delivery of social services. We conclude that the two models of engagement currently under consideration by the Australian government have substantially different outcomes for the health of disadvantaged communities and the creation of a more socially inclusive Australia.
机译:本文探讨了两个当代政策辩论之间的相互关系:一个集中于健康的社会决定因素,另一个集中于当代福利制度内的社会(包容)政策。在这两次辩论中,学者和政策制定者都在努力解决普遍性和针对性政策措施之间的平衡以及地方“交付”组织在促进健康和社会平等方面的作用。在本文中,我们将在澳大利亚最近的一项社会政策倡议“社会融合议程”的背景下讨论这些辩论。我们研究了政府和非营利性福利部门之间提供社会服务的两种提议的参与模式。我们得出的结论是,澳大利亚政府目前正在考虑的两种参与模式对于弱势社区的健康和建立更具社会包容性的澳大利亚产生了截然不同的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号