首页> 外文期刊>World journal of gastroenterology : >Treatment of functional dyspepsia with sertraline: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled pilot study
【24h】

Treatment of functional dyspepsia with sertraline: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled pilot study

机译:舍曲林治疗功能性消化不良:一项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim: To evaluate sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in the treatment of patients with functional dyspepsia. Methods: Consecutive tertiary hospital patients with a clinical diagnosis of functional dyspepsia (FD) according to the Rome II criteria with a Hong Kong dyspepsia index (HKDI) of greater than 16 were recruited. Patients commenced enrolment prior to the inception of the Rome III criteria for functional dyspepsia. All patients were ethnic Chinese, had a normal upper endoscopy and were Helicobacter pylori negative prior to enrolment. Study patients were randomized to receive sertraline 50 mg or placebo daily for 8 wk. HKDI symptom scores, quality of life, hospital anxiety and depression (HAD) scale and global symptom relief were evaluated before, during and after treatment. Adverse effects were monitored during and after treatment. Results: A total of 193 patients were randomized in the intention to treat (ITT), and 150 patients were included in the per protocol (PP) analysis. In both the ITT and PP, there was no difference in the primary outcome of global dyspepsia symptoms between the sertraline and placebo groups at week 8. In the ITT analysis, 98 and 95 patients were randomized to the sertraline and placebo groups respectively. A total of 43 patients withdrew from the study (22.3%) by week 8, with 23 of the 24 drop-outs in the sertraline group occurring prior to week 4 (95.8%). In contrast, in the placebo arm, 11 of 19 patients dropped out by week 4 (57.9%). Utilizing the last response carried forward to account for the drop-outs, there were no differences between the sertraline and placebo groups at baseline in terms of the HKDI, HKDI 26.08 ± 6.19 vs 26.70 ± 5.89, P = 0.433; and at week 8, HKDI 22.41 ± 6.36 vs 23.25 ± 7.30, P = 0.352 respectively. In the PP analysis, 74 and 76 patients were randomized to the sertraline and placebo groups respectively. At baseline, there were no statistically significant differences between the sertraline and placebo groups, HKDI 25.83 ± 6.313 vs 27.19 ± 5.929 respectively, P = 0.233; however by week 8, patients in the sertraline group demonstrated a statistically significant difference in their Hong Kong Dyspepsia Index compared to placebo, HKDI 20.53 ± 6.917 vs 23.34 ± 7.199, P = 0.02, respectively). There was also no statistically significant difference in overall quality of life measures or the HAD scale related to treatment in either the ITT or PP analysis at week 8. Conclusion: This pilot study, the first to examine sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, for the management of FD, did not find that it was superior to placebo.
机译:目的:为了评估舍曲林,一种选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在功能性消化不良患者中的治疗。方法:招募连续三级患者,根据罗马II标准诊断为功能性消化不良(FD),其香港消化不良指数(HKDI)大于16。在罗马III功能性消化不良标准开始之前,患者开始入组。所有患者均为华裔,上内镜检查正常,入组前幽门螺杆菌阴性。研究患者随机接受舍曲林50 mg或安慰剂,每天8周。在治疗前,治疗中和治疗后,评估了HKDI症状评分,生活质量,医院焦虑和抑郁(HAD)量表以及总体症状缓解情况。在治疗期间和之后监测不良反应。结果:总共193例患者按照治疗意向(ITT)进行了随机分组,每个方案(PP)分析中包括了150例患者。在ITT和PP中,舍曲林组和安慰剂组在第8周时总体消化不良症状的主要结局无差异。在ITT分析中,分别有98和95例患者被随机分为舍曲林组和安慰剂组。到第8周,共有43名患者退出研究(22.3%),舍曲林组24例退出者中有23例发生在第4周之前(95.8%)。相比之下,在安慰剂组中,第19周中有19位患者中有11位退出了研究(57.9%)。利用结转的最后一个反应来说明辍学情况,舍曲林组和安慰剂组在基线时的HKDI没有差异,HKDI 26.08±6.19对26.70±5.89,P = 0.433;在第8周,HKDI分别为22.41±6.36和23.25±7.30,P = 0.352。在PP分析中,分别将74和76例患者随机分为舍曲林组和安慰剂组。基线时,舍曲林组和安慰剂组之间无统计学差异,HKDI分别为25.83±6.313和27.19±5.929,P = 0.233;然而,到第8周,舍曲林组的患者的香港消化不良指数与安慰剂相比有统计学意义的显着性差异,HKDI分别为20.53±6.917和23.34±7.199,P = 0.02)。在第8周的ITT或PP分析中,总体生活质量测评或与治疗相关的HAD量表也没有统计学上的显着差异。结论:这项初步研究首次研究了舍曲林(一种选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂)用于治疗FD的管理人员没有发现它优于安慰剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号