首页> 外文期刊>Water Science and Technology >Water systems and risk analysis
【24h】

Water systems and risk analysis

机译:供水系统和风险分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Worldwide the water management sector is about to review the design standards for water systems, as expected climate changes may possibly increase the frequency of flood events. This paper reviews new flood standards for surface water systems in The Netherlands, also presenting a cost-benefit analysis. Flood standards were formulated after several serious incidents in 1998 and 2001 to inform residents about the level of protection that they may expect to receive. At this moment all water boards are about to evaluate their water systems using these standards. The cost-benefit approach has been applied to determine whether the necessary measures to comply with such standards were cost-effective. We found that the standards make too much a simplification of the variety of water systems, and lead to costly measures without being beneficial while many small-scale floods in The Netherlands do not cause any significant damage. A better starting point to anticipate on climate change is to prevent damage, instead of the prevention of flooding.
机译:全球范围内的水管理部门将要审查水系统的设计标准,因为预期的气候变化可能会增加洪灾发生的频率。本文回顾了荷兰地表水系统的新洪水标准,并提出了成本效益分析。在1998年和2001年发生几起严重事件之后,制定了洪水标准,以告知居民他们可能期望获得的保护水平。目前,所有水务局都将使用这些标准来评估其水系统。已采用成本效益方法来确定遵守此类标准的必要措施是否具有成本效益。我们发现,该标准过于简化了供水系统的种类,导致成本高昂的措施无益,而荷兰的许多小规模洪水并未造成任何重大破坏。预测气候变化的一个更好的起点是预防破坏,而不是预防洪水。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号