...
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry >Effect of various putty-wash impression techniques on marginal fit of cast crowns.
【24h】

Effect of various putty-wash impression techniques on marginal fit of cast crowns.

机译:各种油灰洗模技术对铸冠的边缘配合的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Marginal fit is an important clinical factor that affects restoration longevity. The accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques was compared by marginal fit assessment using the nondestructive method. A stainless steel master cast containing three abutments with three metal crowns matching the three preparations was used to make 45 impressions: group A = single-step technique (putty and wash impression materials used simultaneously), group B = two-step technique with a 2-mm relief (putty as a preliminary impression to create a 2-mm wash space followed by the wash stage), and group C = two-step technique with a polyethylene spacer (plastic spacer used with the putty impression followed by the wash stage). Accuracy was assessed using a toolmaker microscope to measure and compare the marginal gaps between each crown and finish line on the duplicated stone casts. Each abutment was further measured at the mesial, buccal, and distal aspects. One-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. P values and Scheffe post hoc contrasts were calculated. Significance was determined at .05. One-way analysis of variance showed significant differences among the three impression techniques in all three abutments and at all three locations (P < .001). Group B yielded dies with minimal gaps compared to groups A and C. The two-step impression technique with 2-mm relief was the most accurate regarding the crucial clinical factor of marginal fit.
机译:边缘适合度是影响恢复寿命的重要临床因素。通过使用非破坏性方法的边际拟合评估,比较了三种聚乙烯基硅氧烷腻子清洗压印技术的准确性。不锈钢母铸件包含三个基台,三个基台与三个准备件相匹配,三个金属冠用于制作45个压痕:A组=单步技术(同时使用洗模和清洗压模材料),B组=两步法,其2 -mm浮雕(在创建一个2mm的洗涤空间后进行清洗的阶段,使用putty作为初步印模),C组=两步法,使用聚乙烯垫片(在腻子模版中使用塑料垫片,然后进行清洗阶段) 。使用工具显微镜对准确性进行评估,以测量和比较复制的石铸件上每个冠和终点线之间的边际间隙。在基部,颊部和远端方面进一步测量每个基台。方差的单向分析用于统计分析。计算P值和Scheffe事后对比。重要性确定为0.05。单向方差分析显示,在所有三个基台和所有三个位置的三种印模技术之间存在显着差异(P <.001)。与A组和C组相比,B组产生的模具间隙最小。就边缘贴合的关键临床因素而言,具有2mm凸凹​​的两步压印技术最为准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号