...
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants >A comparison of clinical outcomes for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites in periodontally compromised patients: a 1-year follow-up report.
【24h】

A comparison of clinical outcomes for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites in periodontally compromised patients: a 1-year follow-up report.

机译:在牙周受损患者中,将新鲜种植体中种植体的临床结果与愈合部位的临床结果进行比较:1年的随访报告。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The aim of this 1-year prospective study was to evaluate, in patients with severe periodontitis, the clinical performance of implants placed immediately after extraction of remaining teeth or in healed sockets and immediately loaded for prosthetic oral rehabilitation, and to compare the clinical outcomes for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients in this study had received periodontal treatment; however, the teeth were eventually deemed hopeless. The remaining teeth were extracted, the periodontally compromised sites were debrided, implants were inserted guided by a surgical template, and a provisional restoration was delivered immediately. The opposing arch was restored with a complete denture. Definitive prostheses were inserted after 6 months. Initial implant and prosthesis stability and the inflammatory response were evaluated. Clinical and radiographic analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 84 rough-surfaced implants were placed (50 in the maxilla and 34 in the mandible). Of these, 32 were placed in fresh extraction sockets. Four implants in three patients failed within the first 6 months, resulting in an implant survival rate of 95.2%. All of the failed implants had been placed in fresh maxillary extraction sockets. The survival rates were 92% (46/50) in the maxilla and 100% (34/34) in the mandible. Prosthetic success was 100%. The mean bone level change (+/- SE) between baseline and 12 months was -1.12 +/- 0.18 mm. There were no statistically significant differences in insertion torque and alveolar bone loss between postextraction sites and healed sites. CONCLUSIONS: The implant failure rate was higher in maxillary postextraction sites. This indicates a heightened risk of failure for immediate implants placed in periodontally compromised maxillae. Nevertheless, a satisfactory prosthetic success was achieved after 1 year.
机译:目的:这项为期一年的前瞻性研究的目的是评估重度牙周炎患者拔除剩余牙齿后或愈合的牙槽中立即放置并立即装载以进行口腔修复的植入物的临床性能,并比较临床放置在新鲜拔牙窝中的种植体相对于愈合部位的结局。材料与方法:本研究中所有患者均接受牙周治疗。然而,牙齿最终被认为是绝望的。取出剩余的牙齿,清除牙周受损部位,在手术模板的引导下插入植入物,并立即进行临时修复。对面的牙弓用完整的假牙修复。在6个月后插入确定的假体。评估了初始植入物和假体的稳定性以及炎症反应。进行了临床和射线照相分析。结果:总共放置了84个粗糙表面植入物(上颌中有50个,下颌中有34个)。其中的32个放在新鲜的提取槽中。在最初的6个月内,三名患者中的四名植入物失败,导致植入物存活率为95.2%。所有失败的植入物均放置在新鲜的上颌拔牙窝中。上颌骨成活率为92%(46/50),下颌骨成活率为100%(34/34)。假肢成功率为100%。基线与12个月之间的平均骨水平变化(+/- SE)为-1.12 +/- 0.18 mm。拔牙后部位和愈合部位之间的插入扭矩和牙槽骨丢失没有统计学上的显着差异。结论:上颌后拔牙部位的植入失败率较高。这表明放置在牙周受损上颌中的即刻植入物的失败风险增加。尽管如此,一年后仍取得了令人满意的修复成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号