首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants >Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone: a clinical comparative study.
【24h】

Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone: a clinical comparative study.

机译:立即将牙种植体与延迟加载的牙种植体放置在上颌美学区的新鲜拔牙窝中的临床比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report a clinical comparative assessment of crestal bone level change around single implants in fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone of the maxilla either immediately loaded or loaded after a delay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients were included in a prospective, randomized study. All patients required 1 tooth extraction (ie, 1 tooth with a hopeless prognosis) and were randomized into either the test group or the control group. Implants were positioned immediately after tooth extraction and were loaded immediately in the test group (20 implants) and after 3 months in the control group (20 implants). The implant site was prepared, with at least 4 mm of sound apical bone below the implant apex, and the coronal margin of the implant was placed at the buccal level of the bone crest. All implants were 13 mm long; 30 implants had a diameter of 5 mm, and 10 had a diameter of 3.75 mm. Radiographic examinations were made at baseline, at 6 months, and at 24 months. To compare the mean values between test and control group, a paired t test was performed (considered statistically significant at P < .05). RESULTS: After a 24-month follow-up period, a cumulative survival rate of 100% was reported for all implants. The control group resulted in a mean mesial bone loss of 1.16 +/- 0.32 mm and a mean distal bone loss of 1.17 +/- 0.41 (mean bone loss, 1.16 +/- 0.51 mm). The test group resulted in a mesial bone loss of 0.93 +/- 0.51 mm and a distal bone loss of 1.1 +/- 0.27 mm (mean bone loss, 1.02 +/- 0.53 mm). No statistically significant difference between control and test groups (P > .05) was found. CONCLUSION: The success rate and radiographic results of immediate restorations of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets were comparable to those obtained in delayed loading group.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是报告对上颌美学区的新鲜拔牙窝中单个种植体周围的即刻骨质水平变化的临床比较评估,无论是立即加载还是延迟加载。材料与方法:40名患者被纳入一项前瞻性随机研究。所有患者均需要拔牙1次(即预后不良的1颗牙),并随机分为试验组或对照组。拔牙后立即放置植入物,并立即将其放入测试组(20个植入物)中,并在3个月后放入对照组(20个植入物)中。准备好种植体部位,在种植体顶点下方至少有4 mm的根尖骨,并将种植体的冠状边缘置于骨顶颊平面。所有植入物均为13毫米长。 30个植入物的直径为5毫米,而10个植入物的直径为3.75毫米。在基线,6个月和24个月时进行射线照相检查。为了比较测试组和对照组的平均值,进行了配对t检验(被认为具有统计学意义,P <.05)。结果:经过24个月的随访,所有植入物的累积生存率均达到100%。对照组的平均中骨丢失为1.16 +/- 0.32 mm,平均远端骨丢失为1.17 +/- 0.41(平均骨丢失为1.16 +/- 0.51 mm)。测试组导致中骨丢失0.93 +/- 0.51 mm和远端骨丢失1.1 +/- 0.27 mm(平均骨丢失1.02 +/- 0.53 mm)。对照组和测试组之间无统计学差异(P> 0.05)。结论:立即放置在新鲜拔牙窝中的牙种植体的成功率和X线摄影结果与延迟负荷组相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号