...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Surgery >Comparison of 2 Equine Transfixation Pin Casts and the Effects of Pin Removal
【24h】

Comparison of 2 Equine Transfixation Pin Casts and the Effects of Pin Removal

机译:2种马穿刺针铸件的比较和拔针效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

ObjectiveTo (1) compare strain on the dorsal aspect of the proximal phalanx (P1) between 2 types of transfixation pin casts (TPC) and (2) evaluate the change in strain as the pins are removed. Study DesignExperimental. AnimalsEquine cadaver forelimbs (n=10 pair). MethodsEach limb of a pair was assigned to 1 of 2 TPC constructs. Construct 1 consisted of a TPC with 2 positive profile, centrally threaded pins placed in the distal aspect of the third metacarpus (MC3) and construct 2 had 4 smooth Steinmann pins placed similarly. A strain gauge was mounted on P1 and axial compression (444.8-5337.9N) applied. One forelimb of each pair was tested as a control with no construct in place. The 2 TPC groups were retested after removal of 1 proximal (n=5 limbs) or distal (n=5) pin from construct 1, and 2 proximal (n=5) or distal (n=5) pins from construct 2. Limb specimens were retested after all pins had been removed. ResultsThere was a significant decrease in strain between both TPC constructs and the non-casted control at all loads except 444.8N. There was no significant difference in strain reduction between the 2 TPC constructs. After proximal pin removal there was a 7% (construct 1) and 10% (construct 2) increase in strain. When distal pins were removed there was a 0.5% (construct 1) and 1% (construct 2) increase in strain. The difference between proximal and distal pin removal was only statistically different from each other at high loads. ConclusionBoth constructs provided equivalent reduction in strain. Removal of the proximal pin(s) increased the strain.
机译:目的要(1)比较两种类型的固定销钉铸模(TPC)之间的近节指骨(P1)背侧的应变,以及(2)评估拔除销钉时的应变变化。研究设计实验。动物Equine尸体前肢(n = 10对)。方法将一对中的每个肢体分配给2个TPC构建体中的1个。构建体1由TPC组成,TPC具有2个正轮廓,中央螺纹销钉位于第三个掌骨(MC3)的远端,而构建体2具有4个光滑的Steinmann销钉。将应变仪安装在P1上,并施加轴向压缩(444.8-5337.9N)。测试每对中的一个前肢作为对照,没有合适的构建体。从构造体1移除1个近端(n = 5条肢体)或远端(n = 5)销和从构造体2移除2个近端(n = 5)或远端(n = 5)销后,重新测试2个TPC组。去除所有销钉后重新测试样品。结果在除444.8N以外的所有载荷下,TPC构造与非浇铸对照之间的应变均显着降低。在两个TPC构建体之间,应变降低没有显着差异。移除近端销后,应变增加了7%(构造1)和10%(构造2)。当移除远端销时,应变增加了0.5%(结构1)和1%(结构2)。在高载荷下,近端和远端销钉去除之间的差异仅在统计学上彼此不同。结论两种构建体均提供了等效的应变降低。移除近端销会增加应变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号