首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Therapeutics >Comparison of anesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of tiletamine-zolazepam-butorphanol and tiletamine-zolazepam-butorphanol-medetomidine in dogs
【24h】

Comparison of anesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of tiletamine-zolazepam-butorphanol and tiletamine-zolazepam-butorphanol-medetomidine in dogs

机译:帕他敏-左唑西ze-丁吗啡醇和帕他敏-左唑西am-丁啡诺-美托咪定对狗的麻醉和心肺作用比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study compared anesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of tiletamine-zolazepam-butorphanol (TT), tiletamine-zolazepam-butorphanol-medetomidine (TTD), and tiletamine-zolazepam-butorphanol-medetomidine with atipamezole reversal 1 hour after TTD administration in dogs. All dogs received glycopyrrolate. All drug combinations effectively induced anesthesia within 5 minutes after IM injection. Duration of analgesia was 40 to 60 minutes. Recovery was smooth, but the overall quality of recovery was poorer in the TT group. Hypoxia occurred with some dogs in the TTD group at 5 minutes. TTD provided better analgesia with longer duration and better recovery quality compared with TT. Reversal of TTD with atipamezole was not effective in shortening recovery time.
机译:这项研究比较了在狗TTD给药1小时后,将抗癫痫药米塔明-唑拉西坦-布托啡尼醇(TT),瓦塔明-唑拉西坦-布托啡尼-美托咪定(TTD)和瓦塔明-唑拉西坦-布托啡诺-美托咪定与狗中的阿帕米唑逆转后的麻醉和心肺作用。所有的狗都接受格隆溴铵。 IM注射后5分钟内,所有药物组合均有效诱导麻醉。镇痛时间为40至60分钟。康复很顺利,但TT组的总体康复质量较差。在5分钟时,TTD组中的一些狗发生缺氧。与TT相比,TTD镇痛效果更好,持续时间更长,恢复质量更好。用阿替哌唑逆转TTD不能有效缩短恢复时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号