...
首页> 外文期刊>Vegetation History and Archaeobotany >The comparison of archaeobotanical data and the oldest documentary records (14th-15th century) of useful plants in medieval GdaA'sk, northern Poland
【24h】

The comparison of archaeobotanical data and the oldest documentary records (14th-15th century) of useful plants in medieval GdaA'sk, northern Poland

机译:波兰北部中世纪GdaA“ sk上的植物植物数据与最古老的文献记录(14至15世纪)的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents a comparison of archaeobotanical data with information about useful plants from the oldest (14th-15th century) written sources that have survived in the archives of GdaA"sk, northern Poland. The main information on plant products, available in medieval documents from GdaA"sk, concerns taxa traded by merchants as well as those used by the Teutonic Knights or the city council of GdaA"sk. In these sources, as well as from many records about cereals, numerous spices and vegetables are listed which do not have counterparts in the archaeobotanical remains which have been found. On the other hand, the archaeobotanical data complement our knowledge on the use of common plants, both cultivated and collected in the wild, which written sources do not mention. This situation is most apparent in the case of local fruits like plums, cherries or berries, of which numerous remains are proof of their considerable popularity in GdaA"sk. This would be impossible to conclude on the basis of historical documents only, whose attention is focused on the more expensive and imported plant products.
机译:本文介绍了考古植物学数据与有用的植物信息的比较,这些有用植物的信息来自波兰北部GdaA“ sk档案中幸存的最古老(14至15世纪)书面资料。有关植物产品的主要信息,可从中世纪文献中获得GdaA“ sk,涉及商人买卖的分类单元以及条顿骑士团或GdaA” sk市议会使用的分类单元。在这些来源中,以及从谷物的许多记录中,列出了许多香料和蔬菜,它们没有另一方面,考古植物学数据补充了我们对野生的栽培和采集的普通植物的使用知识,但书面资料并未提及。例如李子,樱桃或浆果等当地水果,其中大量遗骸证明了它们在GdaAsk中的受欢迎程度。仅凭历史文献就不可能得出结论,历史文献的注意力集中在更昂贵和进口的植物产品上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号