首页> 外文期刊>Trends in pharmacological sciences >Tightrope or Slackline? The Neuroscience of Psychoactive Substances
【24h】

Tightrope or Slackline? The Neuroscience of Psychoactive Substances

机译:绳索还是拉索?精神活性物质的神经科学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Novel psychoactive substances flood worldwide markets faster than they can be banned. Legislators struggle to find a balance between free availability, prescription systems, and criminalisation, while physicians try to balance risks and benefits of drug treatment and identify drug abuse - a tightrope walk. Classification of psychoactive substances is central to these decision-making processes but existing classifications rely on unrelated, inconsistent, and shifting guidelines that categorise drugs by chemical structure, toxicity, or addictive potency. We propose that a new categorisation of drugs based on neurobiological mechanisms of action may help to simplify the regulation of drug use, delivers a neurobiological context, and streamlines classification and future regulatory directions. We provide guidelines to distinguish between drug abuse and treatment and to navigate the controversies over legalising or banning drugs. Finally, we comment on the role neuroscientific research can play in the future to solve imminent problems in this highly important field.
机译:新型精神活性物质淹没全球市场的速度超过了禁止的速度。立法者努力在免费提供,处方系统和刑事定罪之间找到平衡,而医生则试图平衡药物治疗的风险和收益并确定药物滥用-走钢丝。精神活性物质的分类是这些决策过程的核心,但是现有的分类依赖于不相关,不一致且易变的指南,这些指南按化学结构,毒性或成瘾性对药物进行了分类。我们建议,基于神经生物学作用机制对药物进行新的分类可能有助于简化药物使用的监管,提供神经生物学方面的信息,并简化分类和未来的监管方向。我们提供了一些指导原则,以区分药物滥用和治疗,并解决关于合法化或禁止毒品的争议。最后,我们评论了神经科学研究在解决这一高度重要领域中迫在眉睫的问题方面可以发挥的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号