首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION AMONG ELDERLY MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES IN TERMS OF COST AND RESOURCE USE

【24h】

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION AMONG ELDERLY MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES IN TERMS OF COST AND RESOURCE USE

机译：在成本和资源使用条款中，通过老年人冠状动脉介入治疗相对于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠状动脉比较疗效

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research》 |2016年第3期|共1页
作者
Shah R.; Yang Y.; Bentley J. P.; Banahan I. I. I. B.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类预防医学、卫生学;
关键词
入库时间 2022-08-18 19:56:02

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION AMONG ELDERLY MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES IN TERMS OF COST AND RESOURCE USE [J] . Shah R., Yang Y., Bentley J. P., Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research . 2016,第3期

机译：在成本和资源使用条款中，通过老年人冠状动脉介入治疗相对于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠状动脉比较疗效
2. Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: The DELTA Registry (Drug-Eluting Stent for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease): A multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment [J] . NaganumaT., ChieffoA., MeligaE., JACC. Cardiovascular interventions . 2013,第12期

机译：经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护的左主冠状动脉的眼部/中轴病变与远端分叉病变的长期临床结果：DELTA Registry（左主冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架）：评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多中心注册表与冠状动脉搭桥术进行左主治疗
3. Comparative effectiveness analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease and unprotected left main coronary artery disease [J] . EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology . 2020,第1期

机译：经皮冠状动脉介入对慢性肾病患者冠状动脉旁路移植的比较效果分析及无保护左主要冠状动脉疾病
4. 18-Month Outcome After Percutaneous Intervention in Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients [C] . J. Garcia-Tejada, M. Velazquez, F. Hernandez, International Congress on Coronary Artery Disease . 2007

机译：在冠状动脉后旁路接枝患者中经皮干预后18个月的结果
5. Impact of Incident Cancer on Coronary Artery Disease-Related Concomitant Medication Adherence, Short-Term Health and Economic Outcomes Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries with Coronary Artery Diseas [D] . Chopra, Ishveen Kaur. 2017

机译：癌症对冠状动脉疾病的老年医疗保险受益人冠状动脉疾病相关的药物依从性，短期健康和经济结果的影响
6. Very Long-term Outcomes and Predictors of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [O] . Xian-Peng Yu, Chang-Yan Wu, Xue-Jun Ren, 2016

机译：无保护性左主干动脉疾病患者的药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非常长期结果和预测因素
7. Comparative Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries In Terms Of Cost And Resource Use [O] . R. Shah, Y. Yang, J.P. Bentley, 2016

机译：在成本和资源使用方面，冠状动脉旁路接枝与经皮冠状动脉干预的比较有效性
8. Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Coronary Artery Disease. Executive Summary. Effective Health Care Program Research Report No. 9 [R] . 2007

机译：经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗冠心病的疗效比较。执行摘要。有效的医疗保健计划研究报告第9号

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

客服微信
服务号