首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >The role of failure modes and effects analysis in showing the benefits of automation in the blood bank
【24h】

The role of failure modes and effects analysis in showing the benefits of automation in the blood bank

机译:失效模式和影响分析在显示血库自动化优势中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) is a risk management tool used by the manufacturing industry but now being applied in laboratories. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Teams from six South Korean blood banks used this tool to map their manual and automated blood grouping processes and determine the risk priority numbers (RPNs) as a total measure of error risk. RESULTS: The RPNs determined by each of the teams consistently showed that the use of automation dramatically reduced the RPN compared to manual processes. In addition, FMEA showed where the major risks occur in each of the manual processes and where attention should be prioritized to improve the process. Despite no previous experience with FMEA, the teams found the technique relatively easy to use and the subjectivity associated with assigning risk numbers did not affect the validity of the data. CONCLUSION: FMEA should become a routine technique for improving processes in laboratories.
机译:背景:失效模式和后果分析(FMEA)是制造业使用的风险管理工具,但现在已在实验室中应用。研究设计和方法:来自六个韩国血库的团队使用此工具绘制了他们的手动和自动血液分组过程图,并确定了风险优先级数字(RPN)作为错误风险的总体衡量指标。结果:每个团队确定的RPN一致显示,与手动流程相比,自动化的使用大大降低了RPN。此外,FMEA还显示了在每个手动流程中发生主要风险的地方,应优先注意改善流程的地方。尽管之前没有FMEA经验,但研究小组发现该技术相对易于使用,并且与分配风险编号相关的主观性并不影响数据的有效性。结论:FMEA应该成为改善实验室过程的常规技术。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号