首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Demographic characteristics and prevalence of serologic markers among blood donors who use confidential unit exclusion (CUE) in Sao Paulo, Brazil: implications for modification of CUE policies in Brazil.
【24h】

Demographic characteristics and prevalence of serologic markers among blood donors who use confidential unit exclusion (CUE) in Sao Paulo, Brazil: implications for modification of CUE policies in Brazil.

机译:巴西圣保罗使用保密单位排除(CUE)的献血者的人口统计学特征和血清学标志物的流行:对巴西CUE政策修改的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated demographic profiles and prevalence of serologic markers among donors who used confidential unit exclusion (CUE) to assess the effectiveness of CUE and guide public policies regarding the use of CUE for enhancing safety versus jeopardizing the blood supply by dropping CUE. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of whole blood donations at a large public blood center in Sao Paulo from July 2007 through June 2009, compared demographic data, and confirmed serologic results among donors who used and who have never used CUE (CUE never). RESULTS: There were 265,550 whole blood units collected from 181,418 donors from July 2007 through June 2009. A total of 9658 (3.6%) units were discarded, 2973 (1.1%) because CUE was used at the current donation (CUE now) and 6685 (2.5%) because CUE was used in the past (CUE past). The CUE rate was highest among donors with less than 8 years of education (odds ratio [OR], 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.51-3.08). CUE now donations were associated with higher positive infectious disease marker rates than CUE never donations (OR, 1.41; CI, 1.13-1.77), whereas CUE past donations were not (OR, 1.04; CI, 0.75-1.45). CONCLUSION: The CUE process results in a high rate of unit discard. CUE use on an individual donation appears predictive of a high-risk marker-positive donation and, thus, appears to contribute modestly to blood safety. The policy of discarding units from donors who have previously CUE-positive donations does not improve safety and should be discontinued.
机译:背景:本研究评估了使用机密单位排除(CUE)评估CUE有效性的献血者的人口统计学特征和血清学标志物的流行,并指导了有关使用CUE来提高安全性而不是通过降低CUE危害血液供应的公共政策。研究设计与方法:我们对2007年7月至2009年6月在圣保罗的大型公共血液中心进行的全血捐赠进行了横断面分析,比较了人口统计数据,并确认了使用和从未使用过CUE的捐赠者的血清学结果(永远不会)。结果:从2007年7月到2009年6月,从181,418个捐献者那里收集了265,550个全血单位。丢弃了9658(3.6%)个单位,丢弃了2973(1.1%)个单位,因为目前的捐赠使用了CUE(现在是CUE),而6685个(2.5%),因为过去使用了CUE(过去的CUE)。受过教育少于8年的捐助者的CUE率最高(赔率[OR]为2.78; 95%置信区间[CI]为2.51-3.08)。现在的CUE捐赠与从未感染的CUE相比具有更高的阳性传染病标记率(OR,1.41; CI,1.13-1.77),而过去的CUE捐赠没有相关性(OR,1.04; CI,0.75-1.45)。结论:CUE过程导致较高的单位丢弃率。在个人捐赠中使用CUE似乎预示着高风险标志物阳性捐赠,因此似乎对血液安全性的贡献不大。从先前拥有CUE阳性捐赠的捐赠者那里丢弃单位的政策并不能提高安全性,应该停止使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号