...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Paired crossover study of two plateletpheresis systems concerning platelet product quality and donor comfort.
【24h】

Paired crossover study of two plateletpheresis systems concerning platelet product quality and donor comfort.

机译:关于血小板产品质量和供体舒适度的两个血小板分离系统的配对交叉研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Two plateletpheresis cell separator systems were compared in a paired crossover study with respect to the product quality, the number of platelet (PLT) units per donation, and the donor comfort. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty-four female and 47 male donors were distributed to three body weight groups. Double PLT units with 6 x 10(11) PLTs were collected from three Fenwal Amicus Crescendo (AC) and three CaridianBCT Trima Accel (TA) machines. Each donor made one donation on each randomly assigned system and answered a questionnaire on the subjective donor comfort. The answers were scored from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). RESULTS: Based on 182 donations, with 91 donations on AC and TA separators each, 179 runs resulted in double PLT units and three (2xAC, 1xTA) in single units. The white blood cell counts were below 1 x 10(6) in all but eight therapeutic units (8xTA; mean, 1.98 x 10(6)). The mean PLT yield (AC 6.00 x 10(11), TA 5.98 x 10(11)), the collection rate, and the PLT extraction coefficient did not significantly differ between the two devices. Differences of the donor comfort over all groups were only observed for the loudness of the instrument (4.63 AC vs. 4.24 TA, p < 0.001) and the subjective impression of the run time (4.24 AC vs. 4.48 TA, p < 0.05). Male donors greater than 88 kg preferred the TA instruments concerning the impact of the needle, run time, overall experience (p < 0.01 each), and willingness to donate on the same instrument again (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Only minor differences were observed despite the fact that the AC separators are run with two needles and the TA with one needle.
机译:背景:在成对交叉研究中,比较了两个血小板分离细胞分离器系统的产品质量,每次捐赠的血小板(PLT)单位数和捐赠者的舒适度。研究设计和方法:将44位女性和47位男性供体分配到三个体重组。从三台Fenwal Amicus Crescendo(AC)和三台CaridianBCT Trima Accel(TA)机器中收集具有6 x 10(11)PLT的双PLT装置。每个捐赠者在每个随机分配的系统上捐赠一次,并回答关于主观捐赠者舒适度的问卷。答案的得分从5(最佳)到1(最差)。结果:基于182次捐赠,其中AC和TA分隔符分别进行91次捐赠,179次运行产生了两个PLT单元,三个(2xAC,1xTA)单个单元。除八个治疗单位外,所有其他单位的白细胞计数均低于1 x 10(6)(8xTA;平均值为1.98 x 10(6))。在两种设备之间,平均PLT产量(AC 6.00 x 10(11),TA 5.98 x 10(11)),收集率和PLT提取系数没有显着差异。仅在仪器的响度(4.63 AC vs.4.24 TA,p <0.001)和运行时间的主观印象(4.24 AC vs. 4.48 TA,p <0.05)上观察到所有组的供体舒适度差异。大于88公斤的男性捐献者在针的影响,运行时间,总体经验(每个p <0.01)以及愿意再次使用同一器械的意愿方面更喜欢使用TA工具(p <0.05)。结论:尽管AC分离器使用两针运行,而TA使用一根针运行,但观察到的差别很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号