...
首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, Section B. Applied Earth Science >Philosophy of science: a practical tool for applied geologists in the minerals industry
【24h】

Philosophy of science: a practical tool for applied geologists in the minerals industry

机译:科学哲学:矿物工业中应用地质学家的实用工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For applied geologists working in the minerals industry the tasks of problem formulation, observation and data collection, interpretation and modelling invoke various philosophical considerations whether the practitioner is aware of them or not. A primary goal of applied geologists is to build models that accurately predict reality to an acceptable degree. In this paper, we describe the key philosophical frameworks proposed for conducting scientific investigations and relate them to the field of applied geology. We consider the very important differences in the types of problem confronted in experimental sciences (such as physics and chemistry) compared to the historical sciences, such as geology, where the processes studied are unique and only evidential traces of past events are available. The prediction quality of models is likely to be materially improved if the geologist is firmly and consciously practiced in the scientific method. In addition, if the predictions are framed and presented in terms of the underlying science, the quality of decisions made based on those predictions will likewise be improved. The implications for creating additional value to a project or operation can be very significant when geological models are constructed and used by a practitioner with an understanding of the philosophical basis of the activities constituting a scientific investigation. The method of multiple working hypotheses is particularly important when working in historical sciences. We argue that working within the framework of multiple working hypotheses can provide a valuable insurance against the adoption of, or persistence with, flawed models.
机译:对于从事采矿业的应用地质学家来说,问题的提出,观察和数据收集,解释和建模的任务,无论从业人员是否意识到,都引用了各种哲学上的考虑。应用地质学家的主要目标是建立可以将现实准确地预测到可接受程度的模型。在本文中,我们描述了为进行科学研究而提出的关键哲学框架,并将它们与应用地质学领域联系起来。我们认为与历史科学(如地质学)相比,实验科学(如物理学和化学)所面临的问题类型具有非常重要的差异,在地质学等领域,所研究的过程是独特的,并且仅提供过去事件的证据。如果地质学家以科学的方法坚定而自觉地实践,模型的预测质量可能会得到实质性的改善。另外,如果根据基础科学来构架和提出预测,则同样会提高基于这些预测做出的决策的质量。当从业人员构建并使用地质模型并了解构成科学研究的活动的哲学基础时,为项目或运营创造附加价值的意义就非常重要。在历史科学领域工作时,多重假设的方法特别重要。我们认为,在多个工作假设的框架内工作可以为防止采用或坚持存在缺陷的模型提供有价值的保证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号