...
首页> 外文期刊>Toxicology in vitro: an international journal published in association with BIBRA >Short Time Exposure (STE) test in conjunction with Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay including histopathology to evaluate correspondence with the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) eye irritation classification of textile dyes
【24h】

Short Time Exposure (STE) test in conjunction with Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay including histopathology to evaluate correspondence with the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) eye irritation classification of textile dyes

机译:短时暴露(STE)测试与牛角膜不透明度和通透性(BCOP)分析相结合,包括组织病理学,以评估与纺织品染料的全球协调系统(GHS)眼睛刺激性分类的对应关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Eye irritation evaluation is mandatory for predicting health risks in consumers exposed to textile dyes. The two dyes, Reactive Orange 16 (RO16) and Reactive Green 19 (RG19) are classified as Category 2A (irritating to eyes) based on the UN Globally Harmonized System for classification (UN GHS), according to the Draize test. On the other hand, animal welfare considerations and the enforcement of a new regulation in the EU are drawing much attention in reducing or replacing animal experiments with alternative methods. This study evaluated the eye irritation of the two dyes RO16 and RG19 by combining the Short Time Exposure (STE) and the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assays and then comparing them with in vivo data from the GHS classification. The STE test (first level screening) categorized both dyes as GHS Category 1 (severe irritant). In the BCOP, dye RG19 was also classified as GHS Category 1 while dye RO16 was classified as GHS no prediction can be made. Both dyes caused damage to the corneal tissue as confirmed by histopathological analysis. Our findings demonstrated that the STE test did not contribute to arriving at a better conclusion about the eye irritation potential of the dyes when used in conjunction with the BCOP test. Adding the histopathology to the BCOP test could be an appropriate tool for a more meaningful prediction of the eye irritation potential of dyes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:眼睛刺激性评估对于预测接触纺织品染料的消费者的健康风险是必不可少的。根据Draize测试,根据联合国全球统一分类系统(UN GHS),两种染料,活性橙16(RO16)和活性绿19(RG19)被归为2A类(对眼睛有刺激性)。另一方面,关于动物福利的考虑以及欧盟新法规的实施,在减少或用替代方法替代动物实验方面引起了广泛关注。这项研究通过结合短时曝光(STE)和牛角膜不透明度和通透性(BCOP)分析,然后将它们与GHS分类的体内数据进行比较,评估了两种染料RO16和RG19的眼睛刺激性。 STE测试(一级筛选)将这两种染料归类为GHS 1类(严重刺激性)。在BCOP中,染料RG19也被分类为GHS 1类,而染料RO16被分类为GHS,无法做出预测。如组织病理学分析所证实,两种染料均对角膜组织造成损害。我们的发现表明,与BCOP测试结合使用时,STE测试无法对染料的眼睛刺激潜力做出更好的结论。将组织病理学添加到BCOP测试中可能是一种更有意义地预测染料眼刺激潜力的合适工具。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号