首页> 外文期刊>Biological Psychology >Emotional imagery, the visual startle, and covariation bias: an affective matching account.
【24h】

Emotional imagery, the visual startle, and covariation bias: an affective matching account.

机译:情感意象,视觉惊吓和协变量偏差:情感匹配。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study assessed the effects of imagery valence and arousal on the visually prompted startle reflex, heart rate, and estimates of probe occurrence in 24 males and 22 females. Valence and arousal independently augmented startle magnitudes, similar to prior research with acoustic probes (Witvliet, C.V.O., Vrana, S.R., 1995. Psychophysiological responses as indices of affective dimensions, Psychophysiology 32, 436-443). In both of these studies, arousal exerted stronger effects than valence on the startle reflex. Arousal also facilitated heart rate acceleration. Participants' estimates of startle flash occurrence reflected a covariation bias. Estimates were higher and more accurate for the high-arousal conditions and for the negative conditions, paralleling startle magnitude findings. Results suggest that affective response matching processes (rather than affective stimulus matching) influenced both startle reflex magnitudes and probe frequency estimates. Comparisons with the covariation bias literature are drawn, differences are addressed, and directions for future research are suggested.
机译:这项研究评估了图像化合价和唤醒方式对视觉提示的惊吓反射,心率以及在24位男性和22位女性中出现探头的估计值的影响。价和唤起力独立地增加了惊吓的幅度,类似于以前用声学探针进行的研究(Witvliet,C.V.O.,Vrana,S.R.,1995.心理生理学反应作为情感维度的指标,Psychophysiology 32,436-443)。在这两项研究中,唤醒对惊吓反射的作用均比价效高。唤醒还促进了心率的加快。参与者对惊叹闪光发生的估计反映了协方差偏差。高震荡条件和负面条件的估计值更高,更准确,与惊吓幅度的发现平行。结果表明,情感反应匹配过程(而不是情感刺激匹配)影响了惊吓反射幅度和探查频率估计。与协变量偏差文献进行了比较,指出了差异,并提出了未来研究的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号