首页> 外文期刊>Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie >Spatial Implications of Using Firm Level Quotas to Employ Low Productive Workers
【24h】

Spatial Implications of Using Firm Level Quotas to Employ Low Productive Workers

机译:使用公司级别配额雇用低生产率工人的空间含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many Western countries struggle with the realisation of an inclusive labour market: a labour market in which everyone can participate and disabled or otherwise vulnerable, disadvantaged and low productive people can take part in the real labour market to the best of their abilities. Following countries like Germany and Austria, the latest Dutch policy proposal is to introduce mandatory quota for employers with more than 25 employees to create job openings for the disabled for 5 per cent of their workforce. A first calculation of possible job openings shows that from a national perspective a mandatory quota seems promising. However, due to differences in the regional economic structure the arrangement will not be sufficient to solve spatial inequalities in regional exclusion of disabled at the level of municipalities nor for larger regions at the NUTS 1 level like the North of the Netherlands. We conclude that more attention should be paid to the spatial variation in impact when the national government decides to decentralise the implementation of national policy measures to municipalities.
机译:许多西方国家都在为实现包容性劳动力市场而苦苦挣扎:一个每个人都可以参与的社会和残疾人,或者弱势,处境不利和生产力低下的人可以尽其所能参加真正的劳动力市场。继德国和奥地利等国家之后,荷兰最新的政策建议是对雇员超过25人的雇主实行强制性配额,以为其5%的劳动力创造残疾人就业机会。对可能的职位空缺的初步计算表明,从国家的角度来看,强制性配额似乎很有希望。但是,由于地区经济结构的差异,该安排不足以解决市政一级的残障人士在区域排斥中的空间不平等现象,也不足以解决NUTS 1级别的较大地区(如荷兰北部)的空间不平等问题。我们得出的结论是,当中央政府决定将实施国家政策措施的权力下放给市政当局时,应更加注意影响的空间变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号