首页> 外文期刊>Tieraerztliche Umschau >Animal-welfare friendly control of epizootics does not have to be expensive - An analysis using the example of classical swine fever
【24h】

Animal-welfare friendly control of epizootics does not have to be expensive - An analysis using the example of classical swine fever

机译:动物福利的动物流行病防治不一定是昂贵的-以经典猪瘟为例进行分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Swine fever is the epizootic with the largest economic impact in the field of swine production. The outbreak of an animal disease is a potential threat, which can destroy the economic basis of a farm. Furthermore, the disease outbreak leads to high emotional stress for the affected livestock owners due to the slaughter of a large number of animals. Finally, the slaughtering of a large number of mostly healthy animals is increasingly refused by the wider public. The demand for new, more animal-welfare friendly measures to fight animal diseases, as for instance emergency vaccination, has received increasing attention. In this paper, we economically evaluate emergency vaccination against swine fever within the current framework. The results are compared with the ones of the control strategy "culling". The results show that the use of emergency vaccination is economically not a disadvantage compared to culling. However, it becomes clear that at present marketing is the biggest issue to the lack of acceptance of vaccinated animals. Furthermore, the shortage of vaccine, staff or material can be a challenge in regions with a high stock density.
机译:猪瘟是在猪生产领域中具有最大经济影响的流行病。动物疾病的爆发是潜在的威胁,可能破坏农场的经济基础。此外,由于大量动物的宰杀,疾病的爆发给受影响的牲畜所有者带来了很高的情绪压力。最后,更广泛的公众越来越拒绝屠杀大多数以健康为主的动物。人们对新的,更有利于动物福利的动物疾病防治措施的需求日益受到关注,例如紧急疫苗接种。在本文中,我们在当前框架内经济地评估了针对猪瘟的紧急疫苗接种。将结果与控制策略“剔除”的结果进行比较。结果表明,与淘汰相比,使用紧急疫苗接种在经济上不是不利。但是,很明显,目前的市场营销是缺乏疫苗动物接受的最大问题。此外,在高种群密度的地区,疫苗,人员或材料的短缺可能是一个挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号