首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Economic Studies >Can Self-Help Groups Really Be 'Self-Help'?
【24h】

Can Self-Help Groups Really Be 'Self-Help'?

机译:自助小组真的可以是“自助”吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We provide an experimental and theoretical evaluation of a cost-reducing innovation in the delivery of "self-help group" microfinance services, in which privatized agents earn payments through membership fees for providing services. Under the status quo, agents are paid by an outside donor and offer members free services. In our multi-country randomized control trial, we evaluate the change in this incentive scheme on agent behaviour and performance, and on overall village-level outcomes. We find that privatized agents start groups, attract members, mobilize savings, and intermediate loans at similar levels after a year but at much lower costs to the NGO. At the village level, we find higher levels of borrowing, business-related savings, and investment in business. Examining mechanisms, we find that self-help groups serve more business-oriented clientele when facilitated by agents who face strong financial incentives.
机译:我们提供“自助团体”小额信贷服务中降低成本的创新的实验和理论评估,其中,私有化代理商通过提供服务的会员费获得付款。在现状下,代理商由外部捐助者支付并向会员提供免费服务。在我们的多国随机对照试验中,我们评估了该激励方案对代理商行为和绩效以及整个村级结果的变化。我们发现,私有化的代理商在一年后以类似的水平成立团体,吸引成员,动员储蓄和提供中间贷款,但对非政府组织的成本要低得多。在村庄一级,我们发现较高水平的借款,与业务相关的储蓄和商业投资。通过检查机制,我们发现自助小组在面临强大财务激励的代理商的协助下为更多以业务为导向的客户提供服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号