首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Austrian Economics >Best case, worst case, and the golden mean in political economy: An introduction to a symposium on Tim Besley's principled agents? The political economy of good government
【24h】

Best case, worst case, and the golden mean in political economy: An introduction to a symposium on Tim Besley's principled agents? The political economy of good government

机译:最好的情况,最坏的情况,以及政治经济学中的中庸之道:关于蒂姆·贝斯利的有原则代理人的座谈会的介绍?善政的政治经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Tim Besley's Principled Agents is a conceptually challenging work to both traditional welfare economics and the public choice approach identified with James M. Buchanan and Gordon Tullock. Besley's argumentative strategy is to first admit the cogency of the public choice critique of market failure theory and traditional welfare economics and then to argue that the public choice critique goes too far in its pessimism. Instead, Besley argues that based on knowledge from public choice theory, institutional selection mechanisms can be designed in politics to select for both politician motivation and for politician competence. With such a mechanism in place, good government can result.
机译:蒂姆·贝斯利(Tim Besley)的《委托代理人》是对传统福利经济学和詹姆斯·M·布坎南(James M. Buchanan)和戈登·塔洛克(Gordon Tullock)所认同的公共选择方法的概念性挑战。贝斯利的议论策略是,首先承认市场失灵理论和传统福利经济学对公共选择的批判,然后再论证公共选择的批评在悲观主义方面走得太远。相反,贝斯利认为,基于公共选择理论的知识,可以在政治中设计制度选择机制,以选择政治人物动机和政治人物能力。有了这样的机制,可以产生良好的政府。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号