首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Austrian Economics >Is social justice for or against liberty? The philosophical foundations of Mill and Hayek's theory of liberty
【24h】

Is social justice for or against liberty? The philosophical foundations of Mill and Hayek's theory of liberty

机译:社会正义是支持还是反对自由?密尔和哈耶克的自由理论的哲学基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

By comparing the philosophical foundations of Mill and Hayek's theory of liberty, this paper shows that some similarities in the economic theories of Mill and Hayek are actually based on different rationales. It follows that any attempt to find a common thread in Mill and Hayek to provide reasonable guidance for social policy can be promising only if we can find the common ground from their social philosophy. While analyzing the rationales behind their opinions regarding the role of government and taxation policies, this paper will focus on exploring the role of two philosophical ideas, liberty, and justice. This will clarify the relationship between social justice and liberty as well as their status in relation to the ultimate principle of rules in the philosophy of Mill and Hayek. This paper will offer an explanation why, in Mill's utilitarian philosophy, the pursuit of social justice aligns with the real freedom of everyone, but in Hayek's philosophy, it is a hindrance.
机译:通过比较密尔和哈耶克的自由理论的哲学基础,本文表明密尔和哈耶克的经济理论中的某些相似之处实际上是基于不同的理论基础。因此,只有在我们能够从米尔和哈耶克的社会哲学中找到共同点的情况下,在米尔和哈耶克之间寻找共同点以为社会政策提供合理指导的任何尝试都是有希望的。在分析他们关于政府和税收政策作用的观点背后的基本原理时,本文将重点探讨自由和正义这两种哲学思想的作用。这将阐明社会正义与自由之间的关系,以及它们在密尔和哈耶克哲学的最终规则原则中的地位。本文将解释为什么在穆勒的功利主义哲学中,追求社会正义与每个人的真正自由是一致的,但是在哈耶克的哲学中,这是一个障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号