首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Austrian Economics >Praxeology., Experimental Economics and tie Process of Choice: FA. Hayek and Vernon Smith on the Misesian Action Axiom
【24h】

Praxeology., Experimental Economics and tie Process of Choice: FA. Hayek and Vernon Smith on the Misesian Action Axiom

机译:实用主义,实验经济学和选择过程的结合:FA。哈耶克和弗农·史密斯论米西斯行动公理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mises's action axiom postulates that human action is purposeful behavior. While this axiom is the building block for a powerful methodology, it is also incomplete, because it sets aside the underlying processes of decision-making. And while Mises does not dismiss the gap between intention and action, he is silent on it, relegating such a study to psychology. We contend that a study of underlying thought patterns and the process of choice - rather than contradicting praxeology and the action axiom - in fact complements the writings of Mises. To demonstrate this, we look at two authors: F.A. Hayek and Vernon Smith. Hayek's theory of the sensory order sheds light on the process of choice, and explains how decision-making is contextually embedded. Smith's concepts of ecological rationality and neurological "hard-wiring" help us understand decision-making. We argue that cognitive foundations enrich our understanding of the process of choice, and thus of the Misesian action axiom.
机译:米塞斯的行为公理假设人类行为是有目的的行为。虽然这个公理是强大方法论的基础,但它也并不完整,因为它抛弃了决策的基本过程。尽管米塞斯没有消除意图与行动之间的鸿沟,但他对此保持沉默,将这种研究归于心理学。我们认为,对潜在的思维模式和选择过程的研究-而不是与人类学和行动公理相矛盾-实际上是对米塞斯著作的补充。为了证明这一点,我们看了两位作者:哈耶克(F.A. Hayek)和弗农·史密斯(Vernon Smith)。哈耶克的感官秩序理论阐明了选择的过程,并解释了决策是如何在上下文中嵌入的。史密斯(Smith)的生态合理性和神经系统“硬连线”概念有助于我们理解决策。我们认为认知基础丰富了我们对选择过程的理解,从而丰富了我们对米塞斯行动公理的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号