首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic Drug Monitoring >Comparison of 3 estimation methods of mycophenolic acid AUC based on a limited sampling strategy in renal transplant patients.
【24h】

Comparison of 3 estimation methods of mycophenolic acid AUC based on a limited sampling strategy in renal transplant patients.

机译:基于有限采样策略的肾移植患者中三种霉酚酸AUC评估方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A significant relationship between mycophenolic acid (MPA) area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the risk for rejection has been reported. Based on 3 concentration measurements, 3 approaches have been proposed for the estimation of MPA AUC, involving either a multilinear regression approach model (MLRA) or a Bayesian estimation using either gamma absorption or zero-order absorption population models. The aim of the study was to compare the 3 approaches for the estimation of MPA AUC in 150 renal transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. The population parameters were determined in 77 patients (learning study). The AUC estimation methods were compared in the learning population and in 73 patients from another center (validation study). In the latter study, the reference AUCs were estimated by the trapezoidal rule on 8 measurements. MPA concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography. The gamma absorption model gave the best fit. In the learning study,the AUCs estimated by both Bayesian methods were very similar, whereas the multilinear approach was highly correlated but yielded estimates about 20% lower than Bayesian methods. This resulted in dosing recommendations differing by 250 mg/12 h or more in 27% of cases. In the validation study, AUC estimates based on the Bayesian method with gamma absorption model and multilinear regression approach model were, respectively, 12% higher and 7% lower than the reference values. To conclude, the bicompartmental model with gamma absorption rate gave the best fit. The 3 AUC estimation methods are highly correlated but not concordant. For a given patient, the same estimation method should always be used.
机译:据报道血浆浓度-时间曲线(AUC)下的麦考酚酸(MPA)面积与排斥风险之间存在显着关系。基于3种浓度测量,已经提出了3种方法来估算MPA AUC,涉及多线性回归方法模型(MLRA)或使用伽马吸收或零阶吸收总体模型的贝叶斯估计。本研究的目的是比较150种经霉酚酸酯和他克莫司治疗的肾移植患者中MPA AUC估算的三种方法。确定了77名患者的人群参数(学习研究)。比较了学习人群和其他中心的73名患者的AUC估算方法(验证研究)。在后者的研究中,参考AUC通过8次测量的梯形法则估算。通过液相色谱法测量MPA浓度。伽玛吸收模型最适合。在学习研究中,两种贝叶斯方法估计的AUC非常相似,而多线性方法具有高度相关性,但得出的估计值比贝叶斯方法低约20%。这导致27%的病例中的建议剂量相差250 mg / 12 h或更多。在验证研究中,基于带有伽玛吸收模型和多线性回归方法模型的贝叶斯方法的AUC估计值分别比参考值高12%和低7%。总之,具有γ吸收率的双室模型最适合。三种AUC估计方法高度相关,但不一致。对于给定的患者,应始终使用相同的估计方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号