...
首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical medicine and bioethics >Universal compulsory service in medical research.
【24h】

Universal compulsory service in medical research.

机译:医学研究中的普遍义务服务。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Despite the prominence of healthcare-related concerns in public debate, the ground remains infertile for the idea of conscripting citizens into medical research. Reluctance to entertain the thought of a system where nearly everyone could be selected for service might reflect uncertainty about what the project would involve. There might also be a fear that the more crucial issue is how to protect research subjects within current, voluntary systems. No doubt reluctance to explore a system of universal service results from the common hope that each of us might avoid research in any capacity besides researcher. A system of full civic participation might, however, avoid many of the usual objections. Ethics regulations, including informed-consent guidelines, could for the most part remain in force. Though the system would compel people to serve, it could remain responsive to principles of autonomy and justice if it centered on broad public education, community representation, and a lottery-type selection process. The system could draw from the largest possible cross-section of society, and offer conscripts the widest possible range of service. In this way, a compulsory system might reconcile the expectations about healthcare with research needs.
机译:尽管在公共辩论中突出了与医疗保健相关的问题,但仍不鼓励将公民征募到医学研究中。不愿接受这样一种系统的想法:几乎每个人都可以被选为服务人员,这可能反映出该项目涉及的不确定性。可能还会有人担心,更关键的问题是如何在当前的自愿系统内保护研究对象。毫无疑问,由于我们的共同希望是我们每个人都可能避免以研究人员身份从事任何研究,因此不愿探索普遍服务系统。但是,公民全面参与的制度可能会避免许多通常的反对意见。道德规范,包括知情同意的指导原则,在很大程度上可能仍然有效。尽管该系统将迫使人们服务,但如果它以广泛的公共教育,社区代表和彩票类型的选择过程为中心,则可以保持对自治和正义原则的响应。该系统可以借鉴社会上最大的可能,并为应征者提供尽可能广泛的服务。通过这种方式,强制性制度可以使对医疗保健的期望与研究需求相协调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号