...
首页> 外文期刊>Thorax: The Journal of the British Thoracic Society >Response to: Should we give long-term macrolide therapy for COPD?
【24h】

Response to: Should we give long-term macrolide therapy for COPD?

机译:回应:我们应该对COPD给予长期大环内酯类药物治疗吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The letter submitted by Crosbie and Woodhead pertaining to our study of azi-thromycin for prevention of acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations contains a number of errors and misconceptions. First, Crosbie and Woodhead stated that our study was not double-blind. The complete protocol (published as an on-line supplement to the manuscript) indicated that 'This is a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial...'.
机译:Crosbie和Woodhead提交的有关我们对阿奇霉素预防急性慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)加重的研究的信中包含许多错误和误解。首先,Crosbie和Woodhead指出我们的研究不是双盲的。完整的方案(作为手稿的在线补充出版)表明:“这是一项前瞻性,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验……”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号